Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
What is the Falsification for Abiogenesis and Theory of Evolution?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bertrand Russell White" data-source="post: 75912170" data-attributes="member: 433955"><p>Doesn't meet my challenge: </p><p>1. All it had was a name supposedly 300+ years before - only one aspect of my challenge (clear statement that Josiah was going to do .... in the future)</p><p>2. No collaborating evidence (such as other writings outside the Bible - independently dated by experts before Josiah, that refer to this passage in Kings) (thereby validating a date before the event)</p><p>3. No copy of an OT fragment or document, that has been dated by experts before Josiah's reign that had this information from Kings (which would also thereby validate a date before the event)</p><p>4. No other evidence that would indicate a date before Josiah's reign (which would again thereby validate a date before the event)</p><p>5. No consensus within the scholarly community supporting points 2 to 4 (which, if it existed, would thereby confirm that experts had looked at the body of evidence in favor of the prophesy, and finding sufficient support that indeed a specific prediction was made and happened as predicted).</p><p></p><p>The same can be said about Genesis and Jacob. So, yes, I remember you didn't meet the challenge! </p><p>When my challenge is met, I will gladly consider validated prophetic evidence from the Bible. Until that time, I will consider there is none.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bertrand Russell White, post: 75912170, member: 433955"] Doesn't meet my challenge: 1. All it had was a name supposedly 300+ years before - only one aspect of my challenge (clear statement that Josiah was going to do .... in the future) 2. No collaborating evidence (such as other writings outside the Bible - independently dated by experts before Josiah, that refer to this passage in Kings) (thereby validating a date before the event) 3. No copy of an OT fragment or document, that has been dated by experts before Josiah's reign that had this information from Kings (which would also thereby validate a date before the event) 4. No other evidence that would indicate a date before Josiah's reign (which would again thereby validate a date before the event) 5. No consensus within the scholarly community supporting points 2 to 4 (which, if it existed, would thereby confirm that experts had looked at the body of evidence in favor of the prophesy, and finding sufficient support that indeed a specific prediction was made and happened as predicted). The same can be said about Genesis and Jacob. So, yes, I remember you didn't meet the challenge! When my challenge is met, I will gladly consider validated prophetic evidence from the Bible. Until that time, I will consider there is none. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
What is the Falsification for Abiogenesis and Theory of Evolution?
Top
Bottom