Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
What is the Falsification for Abiogenesis and Theory of Evolution?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shemjaza" data-source="post: 75911856" data-attributes="member: 146291"><p>You are the one who brought up Australopithecus boisei, not me.</p><p></p><p>Genetic evidence demonstrate the pattern of relatedness between primates. Finding fossil evidence of extinct branches that are clearly related to creatures somewhere between modern humans and basal apes is just more support for that evidence.</p><p></p><p>If you thought your ancestors came from an area in the Netherlands... and they DNA tested some remains of a villager from 200 years ago with the same surname as your grandfather and the similarity came back as a distant ancestor or cousin then that would be support for the idea that your family came from there.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A primate with clearly transitional features.</p><p></p><p>It has smaller jaw, flatter features, an upright gait and worked tools...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shemjaza, post: 75911856, member: 146291"] You are the one who brought up Australopithecus boisei, not me. Genetic evidence demonstrate the pattern of relatedness between primates. Finding fossil evidence of extinct branches that are clearly related to creatures somewhere between modern humans and basal apes is just more support for that evidence. If you thought your ancestors came from an area in the Netherlands... and they DNA tested some remains of a villager from 200 years ago with the same surname as your grandfather and the similarity came back as a distant ancestor or cousin then that would be support for the idea that your family came from there. A primate with clearly transitional features. It has smaller jaw, flatter features, an upright gait and worked tools... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
What is the Falsification for Abiogenesis and Theory of Evolution?
Top
Bottom