Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
What is the Falsification for Abiogenesis and Theory of Evolution?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Subduction Zone" data-source="post: 75900374" data-attributes="member: 321072"><p>None of your claims without proper support need any refutations. A mere "You're wrong." is sufficient.</p><p></p><p>How the differences are measured is important. Some changes in our genome are very minor. Most of our genome is noncoding DNA. Changes in that rarely makes any difference, whether positive or negative. That is why they concentrated on the parts that matter. There the difference is only one to two percent.</p><p></p><p>If you disagree with this find some real science articles that support your claims. I can run you through the math and show that the number of changes needed is not unreasonable.</p><p></p><p>I am fairly sure that you do not have any valid sources. You keep using bogus creationist terms such as "ape-like". Biologically humans are apes. Even the creationist that first developed the classification system that is still widely used today recognized this fact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Subduction Zone, post: 75900374, member: 321072"] None of your claims without proper support need any refutations. A mere "You're wrong." is sufficient. How the differences are measured is important. Some changes in our genome are very minor. Most of our genome is noncoding DNA. Changes in that rarely makes any difference, whether positive or negative. That is why they concentrated on the parts that matter. There the difference is only one to two percent. If you disagree with this find some real science articles that support your claims. I can run you through the math and show that the number of changes needed is not unreasonable. I am fairly sure that you do not have any valid sources. You keep using bogus creationist terms such as "ape-like". Biologically humans are apes. Even the creationist that first developed the classification system that is still widely used today recognized this fact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
What is the Falsification for Abiogenesis and Theory of Evolution?
Top
Bottom