Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You mean like the other side does with Darwinism? They presuppose that whatever evidence they find fits into the Darwinian worldview. Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black.They agree not to. It's part of the statement of belief they have to agree to before working with the organization. No evidence can be considered nor conclusion drawn which contradicts a literal interpretation of Genesis. You cannot impose such a preconceived limitation on your work and still be said to be doing science.
And if it has some random mutation which causes it to lay more eggs? That bird's genetic line is more likely to survive.Of course it's random. What force is picking one mutation over another? Who is doing the selection? If one of our chickens has some random mutation that give it a tumor or one short leg or some other malfunction, that isn't a gain, that's a loss and the end result is just a shortening of it's lifespan. The Xmen don't exist. Look around you.
Oooo! Is it a conspiracy?You mean like the other side does with Darwinism? They presuppose that whatever evidence they find fits into the Darwinian worldview. Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black.
Agnosticism simply means I don't know which does not exclude feelings of awe. That probably makes me an enchanted agnostic.
I am not asking anyone to accept or reject the ToE. All I saying is they (DI, AIG and ICR) have not put forth a scientific hypothesis, all their articles are about apologetics. I can imagine some there are ways of phasing apologetics as an hypothesis and subject it to the scientific method, but to my knowledge they have done so. Put it to the test and ask them to give you an example of a creationist scientific hypothesis.According to you. Because why? Only because they don't accept your hypothesis of origins. Which doesn't mean they can't use the scientific method.
No, I don't. "Darwinism" is the creationist label for the theory of evolution, but a single scientific theory about biology is hardly a worldview and the theory doesn't apply any place but biology.Again, you think the other view is a conspiracy, don't you? And you know exactly what the Darwinian worldview is.
My thinking is more like the Tao and enjoying life regardless of the circumstances.Feeling awe requires having some idea of what you
are witnessing.
I asked you before. What traits would you not select in a mate?Of course it's random. What force is picking one mutation over another?
Who gets to choose you as a mate?Who is doing the selection?
You answered your own question. A shorter life span means less opportunity to pass the mutation on to offspring.If one of our chickens has some random mutation that give it a tumor or one short leg or some other malfunction, that isn't a gain, that's a loss and the end result is just a shortening of it's lifespan.
You haven't met my dinosaurs.The Xmen don't exist. Look around you.
Funny thing is, atheist will believe that the universe came from nothing based on someone's speculation. They will believe life came from nothing. But they won't believe that a man came back to life even with eyewitness accounts.
They will believe we know what animals were around 64 million years ago. But they won't believe in a book that's the most documented history book of all time.
That's a lie. The creationists use scientific methods also, they just plug their findings into a different model.
You mean like the other side does with Darwinism? They presuppose that whatever evidence they find fits into the Darwinian worldview. Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black.
Just out of curiosity. Did you thank me for answering your question about "a" or "an, or did you thank me for changing inane for nonsensical?Okay ... thank you.
"A" vs "an".Just out of curiosity. Did you thank me for answering your question about "a" or "an, or did you thank me for changing inane for nonsensical?
Lies.
I don't think the universe came from nothing... I have no idea how the universe started. But the evidence demonstrates that the expansion called the big bang occurred about 14 billion years ago and that demonstrates that the Creationist account is false.
I think life cam from chemistry... because it still functions on chemistry and we have evidence that the chemistry that life needs to exist is both common and can increase in complexity in pretense of energy.
What eye witness accounts, Specifically? Records of beliefs about anonymous accounts, that were passed down orally from a generation or more earlier are a far step from eye witness accounts.
On their own they are no more compelling than any other religion or alien abductions.
As to what life existed 64 million years ago, we have evidence. We have fossil remains, we have sedimentary layers demonstrating climate and we have comparative genetics of modern species.
These are not guesses and they aren't just speculation... they are conclusions drawn from evidence.
I've seen no evidence for this. I've only ever seen the unshakable assumption that a literal reading of the Bible must be correct.
If not can you describe evidence that would disprove that interpretation?
Nonsense. Evolution is a conclusion from almost two hundred years of evidence... it's accepted because it's the best explanation not because it's a point of faith.
What should we do when someone asks questions that aren't in the Bible?Give a poor creo a break. If they cannot make things up (Or just let someone else make things up, then parrot them.) they are left with nothing to say.
No it doesn't. The Bible doesn't say when the universe was created.don't think the universe came from nothing... I have no idea how the universe started. But the evidence demonstrates that the expansion called the big bang occurred about 14 billion years ago and that demonstrates that the Creationist account is false.
Which is just another way of saying they are taught to accept it as fact.
No it doesn't. The Bible doesn't say when the universe was created.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?