What is Science?

katerinah1947 · Nov 16, 2015

bhsmte said:
What work?

You haven't demonstrated this scientific controlled study concluding the bible is true.

Don't bother to respond, if you are not willing to show us this work, in detail.

Hi,

In the parlance of Science you have refused to replicate the work. Two sheets of paper or less is all that is needed for a lot of new Science.

The thesis I defended, in front of the entire staff at work, required and explanation of what I had done, and the proof.

You are really not a scientist are you? Replication of anothers work, is going through the same steps they did, the same way they did.

Classically, that is what all of us did with new work, like high temperature superconductors or cold fusion. They said. We did what they did. In the case of high temperture superconductors everyone got the same results, by doing exactly what the original researcher did.

Your refusal to even acknowledge a standard practice in science, say that you are not one really. You might know of science. You might have learned some things there.

You have refused. I understand.

LOVE,

katerinah1947 · Nov 16, 2015

joshua 1 9 said:
They are few and far inbetween on here. People have a lot of anonymity which may explain in part why there is so much animosity.

Hi,

And some of us, have no anonymity, not all but some of us.

LOVE,

bhsmte · Nov 16, 2015

katerinah1947 said:
Hi,

In the parlance of Science you have refused to replicate the work. Two sheets of paper or less is all that is needed for a lot of new Science.

The thesis I defended, in front of the entire staff at work, required and explanation of what I had done, and the proof.

You are really not a scientist are you? Replication of anothers work, is going through the same steps they did, the same way they did.

Classically, that is what all of us did with new work, like high temperature superconductors or cold fusion. They said. We did what they did. In the case of high temperture superconductors everyone got the same results, by doing exactly what the original researcher did.

Your refusal to even acknowledge a standard practice in science, say that you are not one really. You might know of science. You might have learned some things there.

You have refused. I understand.

LOVE,

Ok, you either can't or won't demonstrate this scientific controlled study concluding the bible is true, this is crystal clear.

I didn't expect you to, but thought I would give you another chance to demonstrate.

bhsmte · Nov 16, 2015

bhsmte said:
Ok, you either can't or won't demonstrate this scientific controlled study concluding the bible is true, this is crystal clear.

I didn't expect you to, but thought I would give you another chance to demonstrate.

And by the way, to "replicate work", one needs to see the work.

katerinah1947 · Nov 16, 2015

bhsmte said:
And by the way, to "replicate work", one needs to see the work.

Hi,

Thats a no. No, I won't replicate your work. You keep restating things. And you won't replicate proving the Bible wrong, then publishing your proof, nor which controlled experiments you chose to do, to further understand the situation.

LOVE,

bhsmte · Nov 16, 2015

katerinah1947 said:
Hi,

Thats a no. No, I won't replicate your work. You keep restating things. And you won't replicate proving the Bible wrong, then publishing your proof, nor which controlled experiments you chose to do, to further understand the situation.

LOVE,

What work?

joshua 1 9 · Nov 16, 2015

bhsmte said:
And by the way, to "replicate work", one needs to see the work.

Do you want scientific evidence that the Bible is true? We can pretty much do this all day long. What about Ramses? This was clearly a real person that lived and ruled in Egypt exactly as the Bible tells us. If the Bible were a myth then you would not have any evidence that these are real people we are talking about. So do you have any issue with the over whelming amount of archaeological evidence they have literally dug up in the last 100 years that proves beyond any doubt that the Bible is accurate and true.

"And Joseph placed his father and his brethren, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses, as Pharaoh had commanded." Gen 47L11

Ramesses II (variously transliterated as "Rameses" (/ˈræməsiːz/)[5] or "Ramses" (/ˈræmsiːz/ or /ˈræmziːz/);[6] born c. 1303 BC; died July or August 1213 BC; reigned 1279–1213 BC), also known as Ramesses the Great, was the third pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt. He is often regarded as the greatest, most celebrated, and most powerful pharaoh of the Egyptian Empire.[7]

katerinah1947 · Nov 16, 2015

bhsmte said:
What work?

Hi,

You proving the Bible is wrong, like I did, first.
Second running some controlled experiments to try and prove it wrong.

That work. The work that has been stated five times. The work that you have been presented five times or more. The work you say you don't see. The same work everyone in my field sees without being prompted.

You are not qualified. Admit it.

LOVE,

bhsmte · Nov 16, 2015

joshua 1 9 said:
Do you want scientific evidence that the Bible is true? We can pretty much do this all day long. What about Ramses? This was clearly a real person that lived and ruled in Egypt exactly as the Bible tells us. If the Bible were a myth then you would not have any evidence that these are real people we are talking about. So do you have any issue with the over whelming amount of archaeological evidence they have literally dug up in the last 100 years that proves beyond any doubt that the Bible is accurate and true.

"And Joseph placed his father and his brethren, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses, as Pharaoh had commanded." Gen 47L11

Ramesses II (variously transliterated as "Rameses" (/ˈræməsiːz/)[5] or "Ramses" (/ˈræmsiːz/ or /ˈræmziːz/);[6] born c. 1303 BC; died July or August 1213 BC; reigned 1279–1213 BC), also known as Ramesses the Great, was the third pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt. He is often regarded as the greatest, most celebrated, and most powerful pharaoh of the Egyptian Empire.[7]

The anonymous authors who penned the work, were bound to get some things right, cities, certain people, etc. etc.

It is the core Christian story that is derived from the bible, that science can not prove.

You can try though, lets start with the scientific evidence for a global flood (don't tell me it was local, water above mountains is global) and give a go at proving scientifically, that Jesus rose from the dead.

bhsmte · Nov 16, 2015

katerinah1947 said:
Hi,

You proving the Bible is wrong, like I did, first.
Second running some controlled experiments to try and prove it wrong.

That work. The work that has been stated five times. The work that you have been presented five times or more. The work you say you don't see. The same work everyone in my field sees without being prompted.

You are not qualified. Admit it.

LOVE,

You can't demonstrate a scientific controlled study, showing the bible to be true, admit it.

joshua 1 9 · Nov 16, 2015

bhsmte said:
What work?

Tirhakah was also a real person, not a myth as you claim. 2king19:19 "Now Sennacherib received a report that Tirhakah, the king of Cush, was marching out to fight against him."

bhsmte · Nov 16, 2015

joshua 1 9 said:
Tirhakah was also a real person, not a myth as you claim. 2king19:19 "Now Sennacherib received a report that Tirhakah, the king of Cush, was marching out to fight against him."

View attachment 165940

Can you quote my claim?

katerinah1947 · Nov 16, 2015

joshua 1 9 said:
Do you want scientific evidence that the Bible is true? We can pretty much do this all day long. What about Ramses? This was clearly a real person that lived and ruled in Egypt exactly as the Bible tells us. If the Bible were a myth then you would not have any evidence that these are real people we are talking about. So do you have any issue with the over whelming amount of archaeological evidence they have literally dug up in the last 100 years that proves beyond any doubt that the Bible is accurate and true.

"And Joseph placed his father and his brethren, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses, as Pharaoh had commanded." Gen 47L11

Ramesses II (variously transliterated as "Rameses" (/ˈræməsiːz/)[5] or "Ramses" (/ˈræmsiːz/ or /ˈræmziːz/);[6] born c. 1303 BC; died July or August 1213 BC; reigned 1279–1213 BC), also known as Ramesses the Great, was the third pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt. He is often regarded as the greatest, most celebrated, and most powerful pharaoh of the Egyptian Empire.[7]

Hi,

Actually no. Science works by first tying to prove something is wrong. In the case of Bshtme, the problem is he is avoiding facing the situation head on, and he is avoiding admitting he is no scientist.

Any idea, in Science does not seek to prove something is right. It does not any place I have worked. I started really in College, with the ideas that I must work alone, and I must prove everything. College taught me that.

Going into industry, with a do it by myself mentality and proofs are needed by me for everything is actually the way advanced science is done, when it can be done like that.

Occasionally, large controlled studies are needed. One to one correlations are better. Almost always a large contolled study, leads to a one to one corrlation. Many times they are part of the orignal work. They are only done, when things are too confusing.

And, the studies should never try to prove things are right. They should try to prove that the thing under study is wrong.

That is basic. Bshtme, does not understand that. So, he is not scientist. He is not. And his requests for things that have no basis for the original work, prove that he is no scientist, or that he is here, under, false, pretenses. The later is most likely given some of his responses to others.

LOVE,

joshua 1 9 · Nov 16, 2015

bhsmte said:
The anonymous authors who penned the work, were bound to get some things right, cities, certain people, etc. etc.

It is the core Christian story that is derived from the bible, that science can not prove.

You can try though, lets start with the scientific evidence for a global flood (don't tell me it was local, water above mountains is global) and give a go at proving scientifically, that Jesus rose from the dead.

Myths do not have real people with real bodies. The Egyptians preserved the bodies so we still have evidence of these people today.

katerinah1947 · Nov 16, 2015

bhsmte said:
You can't demonstrate a scientific controlled study, showing the bible to be true, admit it.

Hi,

I admit that you are avoiding the issue.

LOVE,

bhsmte · Nov 16, 2015

katerinah1947 said:
Hi,

I admit that you are avoiding the issue.

LOVE,

Cool. You admit that for me.

I love projection.

joshua 1 9 · Nov 16, 2015

katerinah1947 said:
Hi,

Actually no. Science works by first tying to prove something is wrong. In the case of Bshtme, the problem is he is avoiding facing the situation head on, and he is avoiding admitting he is no scientist.

Any idea, in Science does not seek to prove something is right. It does not any place I have worked. I started really in College, with the ideas that I must work alone, and I must prove everything. College taught me that.

Going into industry, with a do it by myself mentality and proofs are needed by me for everything is actually the way advanced science is done, when it can be done like that.

Occasionally, large controlled studies are needed. One to one correlations are better. Almost always a large contolled study, leads to a one to one corrlation. Many times they are part of the orignal work. They are only done, when things are too confusing.

And, the studies should never try to prove things are right. They should try to prove that the thing under study is wrong.

That is basic. Bshtme, does not understand that. So, he is not scientist. He is not. And his requests for things that have no basis for the original work, prove that he is no scientist, or that he is here, under, false, pretenses. The later is most likely given some of his responses to others.

LOVE,

Dr. Koenig says an exhaustive analysis of more than 1,500 reputable medical studies “indicates people who are more religious and pray more have better mental and physical health,”

Read more: Studies Prove the Healing Power of Prayer

joshua 1 9 · Nov 16, 2015

bhsmte said:
Can you quote my claim?

Your claim was that the Bible is myth and I just showed your claim to be false. All the people in the Bible are real people, they are not myth at all.

bhsmte · Nov 16, 2015

joshua 1 9 said:
Your claim was that the Bible is myth and I just showed your claim to be false. All the people in the Bible are real people, they are not myth at all.

I never stated the entire bible is myth. Like I said, they got some people and locations correct.

What science can not prove, is whether the Christian theology that is derived from the bible, is true.

Please don't make straw man claims with my posts, it gets tiring.

katerinah1947 · Nov 16, 2015

joshua 1 9 said:
Dr. Koenig says an exhaustive analysis of more than 1,500 reputable medical studies “indicates people who are more religious and pray more have better mental and physical health,”

Read more: Studies Prove the Healing Power of Prayer

Hi,

Still science does not work that way, as a proof for something like the validity of The Bible.

LOVE,

What is Science?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Newbie

Newbie

Well-Known Member

Newbie

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Newbie

Newbie

Well-Known Member

Newbie

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Newbie

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Newbie

Well-Known Member

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency