• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,221
7,541
North Carolina
✟345,441.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
To Biblically understand justification (dikaiosis), we must look at three things:
the meaning of the word,
its application to Abraham and
its relation to sanctification.

Firstly, the Greek definition of dikaiosis is "to declare one not guilty, a sentence of acquittal of guilt by the Judge (God)" as the result of
remittance of sin by faith in Jesus' atonement (Romans 3:25),
which remittance is salvation from God's wrath (Romans 5:9).
So justification is simply forensic, a declaration or sentence by the Judge, "not guilty," in right(eous) standing with God's justice.

Secondly, in the case of Abraham, we learn that justification was a
logizomai (credited/imputed/
reckoned) righteousness (Genesis 15:6; Romans 4:2-3), by faith apart from faith's works (Romans 3:28), it was not a "communicated"/imparted righteousness. Rather, God accounted to, credited Abraham with righteousness.

And thirdly, this Biblical justification (logizomai) is not sanctification. For sanctification is by faith's works of obedience in the Holy Spirit, which leads to righteousness (Romans 6:16) leading to holiness (Romans 6:19), while
justification is apart from faith's works (Romans 3:28).
And the NT is emphatic about this separation between them, so that the works required of one are not presented as required for the other where they are absolutely excluded.

So
Biblical justification (dikaiosis) is simply forensic, a declaration, a sentence of acquittal of guilt by faith apart from works,
and a crediting/reckoning/imputing (logizomai) of righteousness to one by that faith alone,
but not an impartation or communication of actual righteousness,
which is by works of obedience in sanctification.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Jun 26, 2003
8,867
1,507
Visit site
✟300,379.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private


The error you make is calling grace imputed. Grace is not imputed, it is infused. Paul says, Christ in you, the hope of glory, NOT Christ upon you. He also teaches that we are not saved apart from good works. He says that it is no longer I that live, but Christ lives in me. How can we say that Christ lives in us apart from good works? Do we not grow in virtue? do we not strive to lay hold of the prize which is the hope of glory? If we stay the same as we were and are not changed, how can we say that we know Him?
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,537
8,195
50
The Wild West
✟761,251.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
How odd that no one is willing to even comment on your excellent post.

Well I think I should comment on it, in that @ViaCrucis did a spectacularly good job.


Specifically CryptoLutheran you managed to capture the key point about Grace, that it is an uncreated energy of God. A number of people including medieval scholastic theologians in the Western church were under the impression that grace is created, but it seems to me that a better understanding is that grace is uncreated and creative, as you put it, God in action to save us.

By the way, the essence/energies distinction as I am sure you are aware predates St. Gregory Palamas and can be found in the writings of the Cappadocians, and I think some Patristic figures before that, even.
 
Upvote 0