Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
What is God?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vap841" data-source="post: 76051260" data-attributes="member: 435200"><p>I like this explanation I think it’s really good, key word being wholly, WHEN this explanation is used as a description of reality (i.e. “Reality is Reality”). If you try to wholly describe reality your head will just explode (be it a theistic reality, an atheistic reality, no matter what it might be). Attaching a grand consciousness to reality itself (God with a capital G) is my biggest brain teaser.</p><p></p><p>So are saying that you may as well just throw all the general revelation stuff out as far as evidence for proof of God goes? That special revelation alone is the only argument worth having when you wanna discuss proof of God? I’m interpreting that as being your point because even with special revelation you still can’t WHOLLY get your head wrapped around what God is. Even Jesus says “I tell you a mystery”, even Jesus knows that his own followers’ heads will explode if they tried to understand everything about special revelation lol, for example trying to wholly understand a triune God. So if I understood you correctly, you were asked the simply question of what is God, and you preferred to point out that all of the general revelation explanations are not ready worth much at all, but even though you also can’t wholly explain special revelation it is still the only answer to the question that has substance to it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vap841, post: 76051260, member: 435200"] I like this explanation I think it’s really good, key word being wholly, WHEN this explanation is used as a description of reality (i.e. “Reality is Reality”). If you try to wholly describe reality your head will just explode (be it a theistic reality, an atheistic reality, no matter what it might be). Attaching a grand consciousness to reality itself (God with a capital G) is my biggest brain teaser. So are saying that you may as well just throw all the general revelation stuff out as far as evidence for proof of God goes? That special revelation alone is the only argument worth having when you wanna discuss proof of God? I’m interpreting that as being your point because even with special revelation you still can’t WHOLLY get your head wrapped around what God is. Even Jesus says “I tell you a mystery”, even Jesus knows that his own followers’ heads will explode if they tried to understand everything about special revelation lol, for example trying to wholly understand a triune God. So if I understood you correctly, you were asked the simply question of what is God, and you preferred to point out that all of the general revelation explanations are not ready worth much at all, but even though you also can’t wholly explain special revelation it is still the only answer to the question that has substance to it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
What is God?
Top
Bottom