Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
What is Creationism?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lucaspa" data-source="post: 647918" data-attributes="member: 4882"><p>I agree with Nathan, your non-sequitors are quite amusing.&nbsp; Of course, they undermine your credibility about everything you post, but they are quite amusing.&nbsp; The junk food of these forums, if you will.</p><p></p><p>John, let's walk you thru this one more time in hopes that you finally get it.</p><p></p><p>1. Micaiah made the claim that he rejected evolution.</p><p></p><p>2. Micaiah claims that is opinions are based on science.</p><p></p><p>3. Micaiah claimed that he was not required to falsify evolution.</p><p></p><p>Now, those 3 claims don't go together.&nbsp; Science works by falsification and, if you invoke science, you <strong>must </strong>falsify.</p><p></p><p>If you reject ideas on any other criteria, you aren't doing science.</p><p></p><p>Now, you and Micaiah should like that criteria and process of science.&nbsp; Because it prevents science from rejecting theism and deity. That you use criteria other than science to reject entities means that you are accepting the arguments of atheists.&nbsp; The Logical Positivists had the same idea that you do -- don't clutter up your table with all kinds of preposterous ideas.&nbsp; And one of the ideas that they considered preposterous was the existence of God.&nbsp; Therefore, using the exact criteria that you proposed, they decided that God didn't exist!</p><p></p><p>Are you sure you are not an undercover atheist, John?&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; You are certainly one of the best destroyers of Christianity I have yet met!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lucaspa, post: 647918, member: 4882"] I agree with Nathan, your non-sequitors are quite amusing. Of course, they undermine your credibility about everything you post, but they are quite amusing. The junk food of these forums, if you will. John, let's walk you thru this one more time in hopes that you finally get it. 1. Micaiah made the claim that he rejected evolution. 2. Micaiah claims that is opinions are based on science. 3. Micaiah claimed that he was not required to falsify evolution. Now, those 3 claims don't go together. Science works by falsification and, if you invoke science, you [B]must [/B]falsify. If you reject ideas on any other criteria, you aren't doing science. Now, you and Micaiah should like that criteria and process of science. Because it prevents science from rejecting theism and deity. That you use criteria other than science to reject entities means that you are accepting the arguments of atheists. The Logical Positivists had the same idea that you do -- don't clutter up your table with all kinds of preposterous ideas. And one of the ideas that they considered preposterous was the existence of God. Therefore, using the exact criteria that you proposed, they decided that God didn't exist! Are you sure you are not an undercover atheist, John? You are certainly one of the best destroyers of Christianity I have yet met! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
What is Creationism?
Top
Bottom