- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,055
- 52,628
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
[/SIZE][/FONT]
We are, adn how it compares to the scientifiic method. Are you actually going to address the post?
[/SIZE][/FONT]
And all the cases where Mr Smith doesn't hang around with a nice confession, but instead cleans up and flees the scene? What do you do then?
Please show me in the OP where a comparison is being requested.
Refer them to the point made in Post 14.
I'd have no problem with this if that was the way creationism actually works in the real world. Unfortunately, it doesn't.MrGoodBytes, do you want to address the OP or not?
Mr Smith shoots Mr Brown, then writes a note that he shot Mr Brown and leaves it at the scene.
Then he stands outside the front door while detectives show up and process the scene.
This would be my estimation of what the OP is calling the "Creationist Method."
Is there a problem understanding it, or are you guys, as usual, convoluting?
[/SIZE][/FONT]
The op can claify, but I read it as a comparison between the two - creationism starts with the desired outcome and looks for evidence, where as the scientif method takes the evidence and puts together a case.
The entire point of the OP is just such a comparison... its right there in the title *wonders how many pairs of taps AV goes through in a year with his constant Fundie dance*Please show me in the OP where a comparison is being requested.
I'd have no problem with this if that was the way creationism actually works in the real world. Unfortunately, it doesn't.
We know that Mr.Brown wasn't shot, despite Mr. Smith's claim.
We didn't find the note at the SOC. It was mailed to the police years later.
Mr. Smith never showed up at the SOC. From time to time, people who claim to be his friends tell the police that Mr. Smith would like to surrender - only they have to catch him first.
Please show me in the OP where a comparison is being requested.
To quote plindboe: "Feel free to elaborate".lolol --- you Atheists kill me --- (pun intended).
The entire point of the OP is just such a comparison... its right there in the title *wonders how many pairs of taps AV goes through in a year with his constant Fundie dance*
Second time: please show me in the OP where a comparison is being requested.
well, to be fair, a written confession written by a guy who CLAIMS to have taken the confession as dictation from the guilty party..."Creationism," whatever that is, need look no further than Genesis 1, which is a written confession of what you call "creationism."
and therews the second part of the fundie two step... rather than deal with the actual question asked, just make vaguely glib, irrelevant remarks that answer nothinglolol --- you Atheists kill me --- (pun intended).
How do you know it was murder?Suppose a Murder were investigated using the creationist method, i.e. Start with an absolute conclusion, search for evidence to support it.
If that is true then what evidence for the spontaneous generation of life from non-living matter was there that promted the scientific investigation into abiogenesis. If there was none then aren't "scientists" doing what you accuse creationists of doing? Are they then scientists?For reference, the scientific method is the exact opposite, You start with evidence and reach a conclusion based on it.
You first need to establish that a "crime" has been committed. In the case of ToE it has not been established it has been assumed (concluded). You have started with a "conclusion" and are (desperately) searching for "evidence" to support it. Again "scientists" are doing what you accuse creationists of doing.Thats right, the same method used in forensics to investigate and solve crime is the same method used by geologists, paleontologists, geneticists and biologists to reach their conclusions in support of the Theory of Evolution.
You mean theCome to think of it, there was a time when criminal investigations were done by the creationist method, It was called the Inquisition.
Wrong word choices. Substitute atheists, agnostics and theistic evolutionists for Atheists and pwn for kill and then you will have made a correct statement for a change.lolol --- you Atheists kill me --- (pun intended).
MrGoodBytes, do you want to address the OP or not?
Mr Smith shoots Mr Brown, then writes a note that he shot Mr Brown and leaves it at the scene.
Then he stands outside the front door while detectives show up and process the scene.
This would be my estimation of what the OP is calling the "Creationist Method."
Is there a problem understanding it, or are you guys, as usual, convoluting?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?