- Apr 22, 2020
- 19
- 34
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
I am talking with a Catholic on discussing what happens to the natives who never heard of Christ. Nowadays there are few people who don't have access to learning about Christ, whether it's through the internet or by a missionary or friend, but the Native Americans, Mayans, and all those people who were previously in this country didn't know about our God. Now I believe it is in human nature to acknowledge the Creator, no matter what they have learned in their society after all the earth shouts of His glory and testifies of His lovingkindness. (Is. 6:3, Ps. 119:64). But my question is, was it possible for them to be saved by just living off of their acknowledgment of a creator and their consciousness to do good instead of evil? Because John 14:6 says "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." Wouldn't this be a contradiction if those natives were saved without ever learning about Jesus, the Son of God?
And if the natives weren't saved, because of their rebellion in their hearts, because not one man is innocent or ever has been except Jesus, wouldn't it be unjust to give some people the opportunity of hearing the Truth and others not?
In Romans, it discusses how the people are judged by their own law in their hearts.. but that will condemn everyone who hasn't surrendered their sins to Jesus.
"Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another
Romans 2: 16 In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel."
What is the correct, biblical way to answer this question? I've been asked this question multiple times, I believed that the natives were judged by the law written in their own hearts and conscience but that seems to be in contradiction with John 14:6, it seems flippant to say there are exceptions in salvation unless I have scriptural evidence.
Thank you,
God bless you all,
And if the natives weren't saved, because of their rebellion in their hearts, because not one man is innocent or ever has been except Jesus, wouldn't it be unjust to give some people the opportunity of hearing the Truth and others not?
In Romans, it discusses how the people are judged by their own law in their hearts.. but that will condemn everyone who hasn't surrendered their sins to Jesus.
"Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another
Romans 2: 16 In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel."
What is the correct, biblical way to answer this question? I've been asked this question multiple times, I believed that the natives were judged by the law written in their own hearts and conscience but that seems to be in contradiction with John 14:6, it seems flippant to say there are exceptions in salvation unless I have scriptural evidence.
Thank you,
God bless you all,