- Nov 29, 2011
- 8,530
- 4,779
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
As everyone knows, the Bible, which is actually a collection of sixty-six separate manuscripts, is a very complex work that says many different things. Because they have different authors, were written at different times in different places, and were written to different cultures, groups, and individuals, it is often very hard to determine and apply the words correctly.
Because the chapters and verses were added centuries after the last works were written, it has become very easy to lift a single verse out of context and apply it to a specific situation in our times. More often than not, it is applied without any reference to the audience or situation in which the work was created.
A single example: in a thread about the legality of abortion in 21st Century United States, the poster quoted Acts 5:29: "We must obey God rather than people". The situation described by Luke was when the apostles were told by the Sanhedrin that they must stop preaching about Jesus. In other words, the issue was freedom of speech, and the apostles were saying that they were compelled to tell the truth about Christ. This has absolutely nothing to do with obeying the decision of the Supreme Court regarding a woman's right to an abortion. Paul wrote to the church in Rome that they were clearly to obey the governmental authorities, which had been established by God. This has much more universal application throughout time than a single, out-of-context half-verse.
I am not defending abortion rights here; that is not the purpose of this thread. The question is: how does one apply appropriate exegesis of parts of the Bible to the modern world, social situations, personal privacy, and any other issue that you can think of?
Because the chapters and verses were added centuries after the last works were written, it has become very easy to lift a single verse out of context and apply it to a specific situation in our times. More often than not, it is applied without any reference to the audience or situation in which the work was created.
A single example: in a thread about the legality of abortion in 21st Century United States, the poster quoted Acts 5:29: "We must obey God rather than people". The situation described by Luke was when the apostles were told by the Sanhedrin that they must stop preaching about Jesus. In other words, the issue was freedom of speech, and the apostles were saying that they were compelled to tell the truth about Christ. This has absolutely nothing to do with obeying the decision of the Supreme Court regarding a woman's right to an abortion. Paul wrote to the church in Rome that they were clearly to obey the governmental authorities, which had been established by God. This has much more universal application throughout time than a single, out-of-context half-verse.
I am not defending abortion rights here; that is not the purpose of this thread. The question is: how does one apply appropriate exegesis of parts of the Bible to the modern world, social situations, personal privacy, and any other issue that you can think of?