• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What does evolution mean to you?

What does it mean?

  • Evolution can only explain slight changes in species

  • Evolution is able to form new species from other ones

  • Evolution started from simple chemical combinations

  • All evolution is impossible


Results are only viewable after voting.

lithium.

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2002
4,662
4
nowhere
✟30,036.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Well I can't really say much on that subject because I don't believe in god, but seebs, smilin and Thebear seems to accept evolution or I think they do and they think Jesus died from our sins. I think that they could talk about this better than I.


P.S. is it pick on Seesaw week?
 
Upvote 0

Do you think this death was physical death? There is a lot of Scripture pointing it out as spiritual death.
 
Upvote 0

EPHRIAM777

A REAL NICE GUY..!
Dec 6, 2002
448
2
PHILLY
✟620.00
 
Upvote 0

EPHRIAM777

A REAL NICE GUY..!
Dec 6, 2002
448
2
PHILLY
✟620.00
 
Upvote 0

EPHRIAM777

A REAL NICE GUY..!
Dec 6, 2002
448
2
PHILLY
✟620.00
 
Upvote 0

lithium.

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2002
4,662
4
nowhere
✟30,036.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
 
Upvote 0

EPHRIAM777

A REAL NICE GUY..!
Dec 6, 2002
448
2
PHILLY
✟620.00
Originally posted by seesaw [/i]

That is your opinion, but you are completely wrong. You seem to talk about evolution a lot, but it looks like you have never studied it. Evolution is mainstream science.

Eph says...

Seesaw...

Defend this stuff if you want...But you don't even realise your defending something that is based on MANY different subjects...that are AGREED upon by the followers of this subject..!

It's a shame that you can't even SEE what I'm trying to tell you...! Because I have studied it...

The entire subject of EVO stands or falls...on there being "long slow gradual changes over vast amounts of time"...In order for things to evolve..!

So in order to back it up..they need "other" sciences to MATCH what each say...But the entire thing is like a "house of cards"...!

Knock one down and they ALL fall...!

There was no long slow gradual change with this planet...things didn't always decay at the same rate...thus Carbon 14 for example is a flawed system of dating..!

So...how did things Evolve if there wasn't a VAST amount of time...for slow gradual changes to occur..?

Do you see how ALL of it is interlocked yet..?

Evo is based on that...So scientists come up with dating systems that START out saying the world is very old...and then seek to prove it...!

A house of cards...thats all it is...ALL built on FAITH in their dating systems being right...! BUT they use these systems to only prove what they already believe..!

So they use fossils to date strata...and the strata to date the fossils..they claim "layers" of snow are yrs...and layers of strata are yrs...When in fact their proof for all this...is only based what they ALREADY "believe" in...!

Remember this....Someone made the world...OR the world made itself...The universe is governed by certian laws..Inertia...gravity...thermodynamics..where did they come from or evolve from..? where does energy come from..?

The Geologic column that Charles Lyle made is only found in textbooks...It's never been found in the earth..or an actual dig...!
 
Upvote 0
Ephraim777,

You are very opinionated. Amongst all the handwaving in your various posts, however, there are a few things that you believe that are just false - not a matter of opinion. For instance:

Evo is based on that...So scientists come up with dating systems that START out saying the world is very old...and then seek to prove it...!

The fact is that this is false. Lyell demonstrated that the earth was very old prior to Darwin. Many Christian geologists had begun thinking of the earth as very old long before Darwin's theory was even conceived.

Fast forward to the late 19th century, after Darwin. While there was significant agreement that the earth was old, scientists didn't have any good measurements of how old. Despite the fact that evolution required millions of years, some scientists, like Kelvin, proposed models for the age of the earth in the hundreds of thousands of years - knowing that if their models were correct that evolution would be falsified.

Both of your premises are falsified. The earth's great age was postulated before Darwin: therefore it could not have been chosen as an assumption to support evolution. Secondly, scientists did not avoid models that showed an age of the earth too young for evolution just to preserve the theory even when they had an opportunity to.

The fact is that radiometric dating has some limitations, but is on the whole a very reliable method for measuring the age of earth's features, including its fossil life forms! Not only does radiometric dating give consistent results when various isotopes with different decay rates are used (with the few exceptions being an excellent means of identifying the occasional inaccurate results), but it is consistent with all of the other lines of evidence.

Like this point, all of the points that creationist criticisms of evolution really depend on - turn out to be erroneous!
 
Upvote 0

lithium.

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2002
4,662
4
nowhere
✟30,036.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Defend this stuff if you want...But you don't even realise your defending something that is based on MANY different subjects...that are AGREED upon by the followers of this subject..!

Huh?

t's a shame that you can't even SEE what I'm trying to tell you...! Because I have studied it..

Well i'm not seeing what you are telling me. Well you might have studied it but I don't think you understand it.

The entire subject of EVO stands or falls...on there being "long slow gradual changes over vast amounts of time"...In order for things to evolve..!

So?

So in order to back it up..they need "other" sciences to MATCH what each say...But the entire thing is like a "house of cards"...!

I'm still not really following you.

Knock one down and they ALL fall...!

LOL huh?

There was no long slow gradual change with this planet...things didn't always decay at the same rate...thus Carbon 14 for example is a flawed system of dating..!

Really? So the planet didn't evolve?

Do you see how ALL of it is interlocked yet..?

No... I'm confussed.

So...how did things Evolve if there wasn't a VAST amount of time...for slow gradual changes to occur..?

So the earth hasn't been around for billions of years? And if it hasn't why does all the evidence show that it has?

Evo is based on that...So scientists come up with dating systems that START out saying the world is very old...and then seek to prove it...!

If the universe looks billions of years old then maybe it is billions of years old. But you are saying it's not and that we are all being lied to.

A house of cards...thats all it is...ALL built on FAITH in their dating systems being right...! BUT they use these systems to only prove what they already believe..!

Nope the evidence proves that dating methods or "systems" are right.

So they use fossils to date strata...and the strata to date the fossils..they claim "layers" of snow are yrs...and layers of strata are yrs...When in fact their proof for all this...is only based what they ALREADY "believe" in...!

I'm confussed again. :hitting head againt wall:

Remember this....Someone made the world...OR the world made itself...The universe is governed by certian laws..Inertia...gravity...thermodynamics..where did they come from or evolve from..? where does energy come from..?

What energy?

The Geologic column that Charles Lyle made is only found in textbooks...It's never been found in the earth..or an actual dig...!

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/geocolumn/ (I think that is the right link)
 
Upvote 0