Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then ask a bunch, lol. What a ridiculous conversation when the point seems to be no more than proving a clearly good answer wrong.
God is not accountable to you, as much as you are not accountable to every animal, not that I am calling you an animal, but rather drawing a comparison of what preposterious requests you think that you can make of God. God is NOT a genie in a bottle where you can clap your hands together and then God appears for your entertainment.
In this regard God doesn't care for your entertainment to appease you. For your appeal is likened to salesmen in a world that deceive one another and be deceived themselves. This is not the trait of the Holy God, but only a vain image madeup by salesmen that think that God is somehow on par with them. If I can draw again the statement that you are not accountable to every animal, right? So why do you think that you are on par with God if your end, as a finite mortal man, will one day go to his grave just like other mortal men.
6“DID I Ever say, ‘You are “gods”; HA! you are all sons of the Creator, the one true God.’ 7But you will die like mere mortals; you will fall like every other ruler.” (Psalm 82:6-7)
The disease that plagues humanity is the flagrant boasting of mortal men who think that they are their own lords many and gods many. Foolishness at its extreme is what inherently renders carnal men to put themselves on a high and almighty peddle STOOL!
God is not accountable to you, as much as you are not accountable to every animal, not that I am calling you an animal, but rather drawing a comparison of what preposterious requests you think that you can make of God. God is NOT a genie in a bottle where you can clap your hands together and then God appears for your entertainment.
In this regard God doesn't care for your entertainment to appease you. For your appeal is likened to salesmen in a world that deceive one another and be deceived themselves. This is not the trait of the Holy God, but only a vain image madeup by salesmen that think that God is somehow on par with them. If I can draw again the statement that you are not accountable to every animal, right? So why do you think that you are on par with God if your end, as a finite mortal man, will one day go to his grave just like other mortal men.
6“DID I Ever say, ‘You are “gods”; HA! you are all sons of the Creator, the one true God.’ 7But you will die like mere mortals; you will fall like every other ruler.” (Psalm 82:6-7)
The disease that plagues humanity is the flagrant boasting of mortal men who think that they are their own lords many and gods many. Foolishness at its extreme is what inherently renders carnal men to put themselves on a high and almighty peddle STOOL!
I literally can't stop laughing since this post...the irony of you telling anyone about "foolishness" and then going on to spell "pedestal" as "peddle stool" like we're all a bunch of poo traders.
Is English not your first language? You clearly don't understand words like "tangible" or "verifiable" or concepts like "cognitive dissonance"...so I'm just curious what the impediment to conversation is here. Are you very young?
Technically wouldn't that be called a "pedal" stool and not a "peddle" stool?
Your argument is from a position of ignorance and this is a logical fallacy.
The argument from ignorance is a logical fallacy that claims that a premise is false because it has not (yet) been proven true by the individual's personal experience. This is often phrased as "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".
You can't discount billions of people across the last 2000 years and counting who have, as witnesses the evidence from their life long experience and this, in no way deminishes their tangible experiential evidence by the absence of evidence in your own person personal experiences, where you called it LACKING, therefore your faulty conclusion as far as the logical fallacy is concerned can not be used as evidence of absence to the existence of God.
You are not in a position to make any claims, because as you admitted that you are lacking the personal experience, right?
For me it isn't a matter of hope, for it is a forgone conclusion. The answer to the existence of God wasn't contrived by the life span of a single individual who admits that they lack the experiential evidence, rather it has been throughout the history of humanity the real and tangible experiential evidence presented by a multitude of independent witnesses.
Your claim that everyone else knows that the independent and historical witnesses are illegitimate is a false claim, that has absolutely no backing what so ever. Do you know how many witnesses are required to dismiss the testimony of a single witness?
Two or more. If there are billions of independent Christian witnesses, then they far out number any Athiest witnesses who want to bring a railing accusation that those witnesses are illigitamate. The fact of the mater is that Athiests claim to the word LACKING as their evidence to the existence of God, so this opinion could not even be used in a court of law as a counter claim to a single Christian witness. Basically every Athiest that ever existed does not stand a chance in a court proceeding to discount a single Christian eye witness.
This is very sad for the Athiest, they have been robbed and Athiest profits them absolutely nothing!
Again verifiable evidence is ratified by billions of independent witnesses, spanning the last 2000 years and counting.
You read books right? You read newspapers, right? You watch online media, right?
So how is it that you consider as verifiable evidence all the historical written accounts and numerous of corroborating witnesses in all the media sources you look at as independent sources of evidence that corroborate with one another?
How can you flip flop on your own constructive cognition in evidentiary gathering when it comes to the billions of independent Christian witnesses?
You have a high and almighty double standard when it comes to Christainity? Why I said it so?
You never apply it consistently, because you continue to feed dissonance into the equation, in order to maintain your rigid preconceived cognition about the none existence of God.
The independent experiences of billions of Christians throughout the last 2000 are verifiable and corroborative. Your personal lacking of verifiable experience is not evidence of absence. Your double standard cognition uses eye witness evidence that is remote from your personal access but you still accept it as evidence, but when it comes to the many witnesses of for Christianity you incorporate a bias and different cognitive rule constructs to feed your dissonance.
When you hear on the news of a plane crash, you hear stories from eye witnesses and you believe them without any preconceived bias of having them verifiably proven to your satisfaction.
Your trying to raise the wall of Berlin when it comes to the existence of God.
This is not how you gather 99.9999999% of your verifiable
evidence. You are not there and you have not touched 99.99999% or what you believed as evidence. You believe what you are told by media outlets and history books, science books, but you have not literally seen it yourself, touched it yourself, independently figured it out yourself, rather you accept it with little scrutiny 99.99999% of the time.
So, if I use your methodology, I should not regard anything I see, read through books and media because I haven't touched it and I wasn't there, right?
In Christianity, the multitude who are having a real and tangible experience with Jesus Christ are testifying it directly as primary's witnesses, who have been touched by Jesus and have been there by experiencing God first hand.
Dismissed!
Because it is a false, fake and phony assertion.
You are not in a position to opine in this regard, remember you said that you are lacking the personal experience!
Am I talking to a human being? Must touch and experience be limited to a cave man five senses aspect? Have not many people been touched by the plights of many throughout the ages, especially people that they haven't even met, let alone physically touched.
You too have roll models in all aspects of life that give you inspiration, whether you like the arts, sciences or theatre, you have been touched by people you know not from a five sense point of view, you haven't met them because they are either departed or inaccessible to you. You may be touched by your grandparents who stood up to Hitler and the likes and even though you have not seen them, you gravitate to them as you feel comforted when you visit holocaust and memorial sites around the world.
You mean to tell me that you as a human being solely apply the five senses as the definition of something real and tangible in your life, oh come on please!
Don't you know by now what cognitive dissonance means and how double standards and biases prevents many Athiests from experiencing Jesus Christ. You have been robbed my friend.p, for Athieism profits you nothing. The Jewish messiah came to the Jews first because he loved them and they rejected him, why?
Jesus Christ should be the role model and great inspiration of every Jew.
Can I invite you as a friend to at least call upon the name of Jesus Christ in English or in Hebrew to let him reveal himself to you?
You have absolutely nothing to loose and everything to gain.
Why Christians do what they do, even after what became of them in the Bolshevik Revolution is because they have been touched by the Jewish Messiah who loves Jews and wants them back on his side and by his side.
How wonderful, thankyou for correcting me. You must be the second person who has corrected me, thankyou.
If I can draw again the statement that you are not accountable to every animal, right? So why do you think that you are on par with God if your end, as a finite mortal man, will one day go to his grave just like other mortal men.
Then God said, "Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground." (Genesis 1:26)
Did the dog or the cat pick you as their owner or you chose it?
God has dominion over man and man has dominion over animals and this is the natural hierarchy.
Your argument is from a position of ignorance and this is a logical fallacy.
You can't discount billions of people across the last 2000 years and counting who have, as witnesses the evidence from their life long experience and this, in no way deminishes their tangible experiential evidence by the absence of evidence in your own person personal experiences, where you called it LACKING, therefore your faulty conclusion as far as the logical fallacy is concerned can not be used as evidence of absence to the existence of God.
You are not in a position to make any claims, because as you admitted that you are lacking the personal experience, right?
For me it isn't a matter of hope, for it is a forgone conclusion. The answer to the existence of God wasn't contrived by the life span of a single individual who admits that they lack the experiential evidence, rather it has been throughout the history of humanity the real and tangible experiential evidence presented by a multitude of independent witnesses.
Your claim that everyone else knows that the independent and historical witnesses are illegitimate is a false claim, that has absolutely no backing what so ever. Do you know how many witnesses are required to dismiss the testimony of a single witness?
Two or more. If there are billions of independent Christian witnesses, then they far out number any Athiest witnesses who want to bring a railing accusation that those witnesses are illigitamate. The fact of the mater is that Athiests claim to the word LACKING as their evidence to the existence of God, so this opinion could not even be used in a court of law as a counter claim to a single Christian witness. Basically every Athiest that ever existed does not stand a chance in a court proceeding to discount a single Christian eye witness.
This is very sad for the Athiest, they have been robbed and Athiest profits them absolutely nothing!
Again verifiable evidence is ratified by billions of independent witnesses, spanning the last 2000 years and counting.
You read books right? You read newspapers, right? You watch online media, right?
So how is it that you consider as verifiable evidence all the historical written accounts and numerous of corroborating witnesses in all the media sources you look at as independent sources of evidence that corroborate with one another?
How can you flip flop on your own constructive cognition in evidentiary gathering when it comes to the billions of independent Christian witnesses?
You have a high and almighty double standard when it comes to Christainity? Why I said it so?
You never apply it consistently, because you continue to feed dissonance into the equation, in order to maintain your rigid preconceived cognition about the none existence of God.
The independent experiences of billions of Christians throughout the last 2000 are verifiable and corroborative.
Your personal lacking of verifiable experience is not evidence of absence. Your double standard cognition uses eye witness evidence that is remote from your personal access but you still accept it as evidence, but when it comes to the many witnesses of for Christianity you incorporate a bias and different cognitive rule constructs to feed your dissonance.
When you hear on the news of a plane crash, you hear stories from eye witnesses and you believe them without any preconceived bias of having them verifiably proven to your satisfaction.
Your trying to raise the wall of Berlin when it comes to the existence of God.
This is not how you gather 99.9999999% of your verifiable
evidence. You are not there and you have not touched 99.99999% or what you believed as evidence. You believe what you are told by media outlets and history books, science books, but you have not literally seen it yourself, touched it yourself, independently figured it out yourself, rather you accept it with little scrutiny 99.99999% of the time.
So, if I use your methodology, I should not regard anything I see, read through books and media because I haven't touched it and I wasn't there, right?
In Christianity, the multitude who are having a real and tangible experience with Jesus Christ
are testifying it directly as primary's witnesses, who have been touched by Jesus and have been there by experiencing God first hand.
Dismissed!
Because it is a false, fake and phony assertion.
You are not in a position to opine in this regard, remember you said that you are lacking the personal experience!
Am I talking to a human being? Must touch and experience be limited to a cave man five senses aspect? Have not many people been touched by the plights of many throughout the ages, especially people that they haven't even met, let alone physically touched.
You too have roll models
in all aspects of life that give you inspiration, whether you like the arts, sciences or theatre, you have been touched by people you know not from a five sense point of view,
you haven't met them because they are either departed or inaccessible to you. You may be touched by your grandparents who stood up to Hitler and the likes and even though you have not seen them, you gravitate to them as you feel comforted when you visit holocaust and memorial sites around the world.
You mean to tell me that you as a human being solely apply the five senses as the definition of something real and tangible in your life, oh come on please!
Don't you know by now what cognitive dissonance means and how double standards and biases prevents many Athiests from experiencing Jesus Christ. You have been robbed my friend, for Athieism profits you nothing. The Jewish messiah came to the Jews first because he loved them and they rejected him, why?
Jesus Christ should be the role model and great inspiration of every Jew.
Can I invite you as a friend to at least call upon the name of Jesus Christ in English or in Hebrew to let him reveal himself to you?
You have absolutely nothing to loose and everything to gain.
Why Christians do what they do, even after what became of them in the Bolshevik Revolution is because they have been touched by the Jewish Messiah who loves Jews and wants them back on his side and by his side.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?