Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Of course not, and?
Actually, I'd better help you with that..
Doesn't make it not a fallacy either. True or false is often in the eye of the beholder.... Both views were given and clearly mine was thought to be false, just as I considered the opposing view false. I think your fishing for a problem that doesn't exist.
I was very clear, and if you cannot follow it after all that, you confirm what has been evident all along, you are refusing to see the obvious, or there is something off with you. Sorry that is the kindest way I can put it.
I went to the trouble to explain things thoroughly and it's not fully unexpected the excuses would follow, but you haven't and regardless of how hard you try, never will have a leg to stand on. But keep picking if you like.
We disagree, I stand with my opinion as correct and always will as I indicated early on, making the other opinion fallacy IMO. If it is not acceptable to you for someone to stand firmly with an opinion after hearing both sides, then we disagree there as well.
Tell you what, just keep posting the same question/accusation over and over again until you get it out of your system, it may help.
A fallacy is a false hood, and pretending I don't know what a logical fallacy is, a term I never used, along with your other recent posts/desperate attempts to weasel out of something that is so simple and clear just is has always was, is just too sad for me to bear.
I think were done here.
Stop adding the word "logical" I don't care what a logical fallacy is. My comment did not include that. And that's not really so much for you, we are done, it's to be certain readers aren't misled with your add ons that I already covered once.
Haven't you dug yourself in deep enough? Please, stop doing this to yourself. I'm uncomfortable for you.
Athiests claim that God does not exist.
True Atheism is flat out rejection of external deity figure.
Any thoughts?
Profit? It doesn't. Benefit? I would say atheists benefit from a view of reality more accurate than their theistic brethren.
Atheism is a response to a claim. Theists claim that some god exists. My response is: I don't believe your claim, and until you can provide evidence to support it, I will continue withholding my belief.
Therefore Athiesm is nothing on its own merit and comes only into play as a response to questio n in regards to the existence of God.
Do Athiesm is a response in a counter claim to reject the existance of God.
Within the scientific community a claim or theory is to be taken as truth into evidence unless it is proven wrong.
The ball is in the Athiest court to prove that the Christian claim to the existance of God is wrong.
For Athiests to do so, they have the burden to prove otherwise and in doing so they are claiming tgat Hod doesn't exist.
I hope I have cleared up the smoke screen.
Having read your reply to me, along with the next couple posts you did, it's pretty clear you have absolutely no idea what a logical fallacy is.
So, it makes sense why you didn't tell me which fallacy I committed. However, on the other hand it's pretty funny how your post is written with such a smug tone when it turns out the person who isn't keeping up is you....
A fallacy is not something you simply disagree with, a fallacy is a specific type of logical flaw found in the structure of an argument.
Here is a list of both formal and informal logical fallacies: List of fallacies - Wikipedia
For example, saying "X is true because everyone knows it's true" is an appeal to popularity fallacy or an argumentum ad populum.
It's an error in logic to say something is true just because people think it is. It's possible all those people are wrong.
Likewise if someone says "X is true because I can't imagine another way it could have been done" is an argument from ignorance fallacy. Just because you can't imagine another explanation doesn't mean the one you've come up with is correct.
Hence, a fallacy is a specific type of logical error in an argument. You accused me of making one, and I asked you which one. Looks like up until now you didn't understand what a fallacy is.
This response was to the part you wrote originally accusing me of committing a fallacy. I did go back and read it, and it's apparently clear you didn't understand what you were accusing me of
Actually, the key to understanding this, for your future reference is to understand the words you are using when you accuse someone of something.
You accused me of committing a logical fallacy when I did not. When pressed on it, you said something is a fallacy because you disagree with the argument, which it is not.
You may disagree with my argument, however it was not a fallacious argument.
The person who hopefully got something out of this is you. Hopefully you've been educated on the basics of logic and logical fallacies, and you'll study up on the topic more. Being able to identify fallacies in an argument go a long way to protecting you against scammers and other false claims about the world.
Therefore Athiesm is nothing on its own merit and comes only into play as a response to the question in regards to the existence of God.
So Athiesm is a response, leading towards a counter claim to reject the existance of God.
Within the scientific community a claim or theory is to be taken as truth into evidence unless it is proven wrong.
The ball is in the Athiest court to prove that the Christian claim to the existance of God is wrong.
For Athiests to do so, they have the burden to prove otherwise and in so doing they are claiming that God doesn't exist.
I hope I have cleared up the smoke screen.
Hello.
Please forgive me. I was wondering if this post you made could be seen as a 'fallacy fallacy'?
Please let me know what you think
Thank you
The scientific community doesn't accept every idea unless it's proven to be wrong.
Ideas are known as hypotheses which are not accepted as true unless they undergo a battery of tests and independent peer review. If it passes all attempts to falsify it, then it is tentatively accepted pending further evidence which may come along and discredit it.
God is a hypothesis, theists have not yet shown sufficient evidence to support the claim that it exists. Until there is some kind of solid evidence to examine then theism has not met its burden of proof, and we can not be justified in accepting the claim.
I'm not sure how you'd conclude that, what part in particular do you mean?
Are you referring to the reality of... It all started from nothing or something, somewhere, for no reason that we know of, over... Created, and for a reason, just as we have seen anything and everything come about with our own eyes, and have never ever seen it come about any other way?
Must be a matter of perception of reality, cuz I'm just not seeing it.
fallacy fallacy is a logical fallacy that occurs when it is claimed that if an argument contains a logical fallacy, the proposition it was used to support is wrong.
Hello.
With the concept of burden of proof. What type of proof would you require?
The scientific community doesn't accept every idea unless it's proven to be wrong.
Ideas are known as hypotheses which are not accepted as true unless they undergo a battery of tests and independent peer review. If it passes all attempts to falsify it, then it is tentatively accepted pending further evidence which may come along and discredit it.
God is a hypothesis, theists have not yet shown sufficient evidence to support the claim that it exists. Until there is some kind of solid evidence to examine then theism has not met its burden of proof, and we can not be justified in accepting the claim.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?