• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What do atheists think of polygamy?

Caylin

Formerly Dracon427
Feb 15, 2004
7,066
316
41
Olympia, Washington
✟31,514.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship

I think polygamy as expressed in male dominated cultures is bad because it reduces the female to a commodity. However, if more than two people love each other, I have no problem with that as long as honesty is maintained.
 
Upvote 0

Museveni

Homo Sapiens Invictus
Feb 28, 2007
892
52
Sweden
✟16,345.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Concidering that Moral and Ethics are little more then a persons own ideas of "Right and Wrong" I fail to see how someone can have low morals or be immoral.

Personaly I find intolerance towards people of other cultures and sexual orientations to be wrong so by my standards then(extremist) christians are immoral.

As far as polygamy goes I dont see any real problem with it as long as everyone agrees on it. Aside ofcourse from the fact that some guys might horde all the hot chicks..
 
Upvote 0

Pepperoni

(clever saying goes here)
Feb 22, 2006
1,553
365
59
The Great Lake State
✟26,111.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I have to wonder what atheists base their morality on. The answer of "it's my personal feelings on what is right and/or wrong" doesn't hold any water. How are these opinions formed? Surely it must be based on something tangible.
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,301
✟182,792.00
Faith
Seeker
I have to wonder what atheists base their morality on. The answer of "it's my personal feelings on what is right and/or wrong" doesn't hold any water. How are these opinions formed? Surely it must be based on something tangible.
It´s a similar method to that which use to form your opinion which god you want to let you determine your morality. It´s just more, umm, direct.
 
Upvote 0

bammertheblue

Veteran
Feb 10, 2006
1,798
161
41
Washington, DC
✟17,877.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Can't speak for everyone, but for me it's based on "Does this action harm another person?"

I have to wonder what atheists base their morality on. The answer of "it's my personal feelings on what is right and/or wrong" doesn't hold any water. How are these opinions formed? Surely it must be based on something tangible.
 
Upvote 0

TemperateSeaIsland

Mae hen wlad fy nhadau yn annwyl i mi
Aug 7, 2005
3,195
171
Wales, UK
✟29,685.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I have to wonder what atheists base their morality on. The answer of "it's my personal feelings on what is right and/or wrong" doesn't hold any water. How are these opinions formed? Surely it must be based on something tangible.

Empathy;
If I was going to do something that would effect person A I would put myself in their shoes and ask myself "If someone did what I'm thinking of doing to me how would I feel?" If its a negative then I wont do it. Its essentially the golder rule.
 
Upvote 0

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,498
157
44
Atlanta, GA
✟31,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I think it should be the government's business if there was a huge movement to have it legalized. The negative consequences of polygamy far outweigh the positive ones. Don't believe me? I've known, personally, two polygamists in my life. One guy got into a huge mess when one of his partners stopped taking her birth control pill without his knowledge and she got pregnant. Then the other partner became jealous and did the same thing. So here is this young man with two pregnant girlfriends, each one vieing for his undivided attention. Girlfriend #1 thought she deserved more attention because she got pregnant first. Girlfriend #2 thought she deserved more attention because she had been his girlfriend for about a year before they entered into a polyamorous relationship. What a mess! In the end, both girls left him and they went their separate ways with bitter resentment toward one another. Couple number two was a married couple who had adopted the swinger's lifestyle hoping to find a good match to bring into their home on a permanent basis. Of course, the women the wife liked the husband didn't and vice versa. Then the wife became suspicious he was looking for the new partner without her being present and she accused him of cheating. They ended up having to go through marriage counseling.

The problem with legalized polygamy is that it causes a huge problem if one spouse dies or divorces from the "family". How would the assets be divided? Who would get custody of the children? It's a big enough mess when two people go through this, can you imagine three or more? And what about the children? Having to live a secret life out of fear and shame? What about people who already practice polygamy in secret and the wives share the children and the husband hops from bed to bed every night of the week? These kids never know who is more important in the family or who is the favorite. You want to practice polygamy? Fine, but leave kids out of it. They don't deserve that sort of life.
 
Reactions: Eudaimonist
Upvote 0

GryffinSong

open-minded skeptic
May 7, 2007
843
52
✟23,739.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
This is a really interesting question.

From a legal perspective, I believe that the government shouldn't legislate morality. As long as all parties are fully consenting to the behavior, it's not really my business, and it certainly isn't the government's business.

From a personal perspective, I wouldn't tolerate a polygamous situation. I'm not interested in sharing what is a deep, personal relationship. And since as far as I can tell (and I could be wrong) it seems like polygamous groups tend to be patriarchal and the women subservient, I'm SO not interested. I'm a strong, independent woman, and I'm not taking back seat in a relationship, especially to another woman.

As far as morality? I'm not prepared to comment. Morality is so cultural, and so private. I saw a Discovery Channel special the other day on a primitive tribal culture out in the islands somewhere (south pacific maybe?). They have a polygamous society, and the women seemed to like sharing the work and child rearing together. And the women were allowed to divorce the man simply by moving out. So if it wasn't working for them, they could move back in with their family of origin or with their brother, or somesuch. It seems to be a successful survival strategy for them, so who am I to tell them they're wrong?
 
Reactions: Pepperoni
Upvote 0

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,498
157
44
Atlanta, GA
✟31,699.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Like I said, there can't be any of this, "I can do what I want and as long as it feels right it's no one's business...not even the government's!" when there are children involved. When there aren't any kids in the picture, hey, whatever floats your boat make it sail, babe. But when children are involved, that's when the "I'll do whatever I want" era ends. At that point it becomes about how will this affect the children and I don't care how well the parties seem to get along, polygamy in a civilized society will always be difficult for the children.
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,301
✟182,792.00
Faith
Seeker
Maybe polyandry is more to your liking, then?

(Just thought a bit about a hypothetical society that has polygamy and polyandry simultaneously. Funny constellations possible. )
 
Upvote 0

Robbie_James_Francis

May all beings have happiness and its causes
Apr 12, 2005
9,317
661
35
England, UK
✟27,761.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Personally, I couldn't deal with a polygamous relationship. I don't believe that most people could, and I think most people are going to have serious problems if they engage in one. If they want to, I have no right to stop them, but I think it is very unwise.

I think institutionalised polygyny, which has existed in some form in the majority of societies and still does in some, is very negative because it makes women second-class citizens and commodities and perpetuates patriarchal injustice.

Institutionalised polyandry, which is extremely rare (existing, as I recall, in roughly 1% of societies through history), oddly enough, has the same effect in my opinion. As far as I'm aware, it has always been fraternal, with brothers having one wife between them.

Thus both systems give men the exclusive and supreme prerogative to oppress women.

I have to wonder what atheists base their morality on. The answer of "it's my personal feelings on what is right and/or wrong" doesn't hold any water. How are these opinions formed? Surely it must be based on something tangible.

Why? Yours isn't. The Bible is a book that is interpreted and re-interpreted and every time you or anyone else reads it you are filling it with your own inferences based on your personal experience, opinion and belief. It is on these inferences, and not the Bible itself, that a Christian's morality is based. The same is true of church tradition, the community or the ecclesial authorities if those if those are important in your denomination.

There is no other way to explain the ability of 'Bible-believing Christians' as a group through culture and history to be both for and against every issue under the sun, from abortion to slavery.
 
Reactions: GryffinSong
Upvote 0