durangodawood
re Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 27,461
- 19,157
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Quick image search. Yep totally white. Both of them.The pictures tell a different story.
That's the academic version.I see belly buttons in the images too.
You have no idea what "artist's impression" means, do you?That's the academic version.
You know how they like to drive home their theories with pictures.
Like this doosey:
Since a picture is worth a thousand words, this says a lot.You have no idea what "artist's impression" means, do you?
Except that is a piece of art based on actual remains that people have studied.That's the academic version.
You know how they like to drive home their theories with pictures.
Like this doosey:
Adam looked like me, of course, but without the belly.Ditto for what Adam and Eve looked like?
Binomen please?Except that is a piece of art based on actual remains that people have studied.
I'm wondering if one poster here thinks that's nonsense.Adam looked like me, of course, but without the belly.
In guessing Homo neanderthalensis... but there are other non Homo sapiens hominids who are evidenced to have existed in that kind of environment.Binomen please?
There's always one.I'm wondering if one poster here thinks that's nonsense.
Why would scientists label a Homo neanderthalensis a Hesperphiticus haroldcookii?In guessing Homo neanderthalensis...
Something's wrong in Hong Kong.Except that is a piece of art based on actual remains that people have studied.
They have their bones and they have their genes.
I reported that picture as "Erotic Artwork."There's always one.
While toungue in cheek, the post was not without a level of seriousness.
I can never use that phrase againI reported that picture as "Erotic Artwork."
But it does bring out a point: the navels.
I was talking to my YEC nephew the other day and pointing out flaws in Linnaeus' classification system vis-à-vis what the Bible has to say.I can never use that phrase again.
Guess a navel would be to Adam what tree rings would be to brand new grown trees.
Easy, evidence.Why would scientists label a Homo neanderthalensis a Hesperphiticus haroldcookii?
And if they didn't, what's that guy in that picture? Neanderthal or Cookii?
And if it's Cookii, why did you say this:
Something's wrong in Hong Kong.
I didn't say one word about Neanderthal, did I?Multiple sets of remains with treatable DNA is significant. And that's what the Neanderthal has.
Only because you can't trace their DNA back that far.Shemjaza said:Adam and Eve have no such thing.
HALLEUJAH!Shemjaza said:If the Bible is literally accurate, then it is because of divine intervention and not because it's based on evidence.
I was talking to my YEC nephew the other day and pointing out flaws in Linnaeus' classification system vis-à-vis what the Bible has to say.
I used two of my favorite examples: fish and dinosaurs.
While the whale is a mammal that has lungs, the fish is an animal with gills; yet Jonah calls it a "whale," whereas Jesus calls it a "great fish."
You're absolutely right.Jonah doesn't call it a whale though....
That's a result of the artists being European. Depictions by Middle Eastern, Asian, Ethiopian etc artists reflect their ethnicity.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?