• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What are the Weaknesses of Evolution?

Status
Not open for further replies.

MrGoodBytes

Seeker for life, probably
Mar 4, 2006
5,868
286
✟30,272.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Do you know who exposed the Piltdown Man fraud?
 
Upvote 0

NailsII

Life-long student of biological science
Jul 25, 2007
1,690
48
UK
✟17,147.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
More a whimper than a bang for post 100, but I was wondering if there was a link to these numbers, that laid them all out.

I have some other fundamentalists I'd like to share this info with

http://www.biblegateway.com/

search for yourself.
If you knew the bible as well as you think you do, you wouldn't need to search that hard.
 
Upvote 0

NailsII

Life-long student of biological science
Jul 25, 2007
1,690
48
UK
✟17,147.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Did you stay up all night counting? How ridiculous an argument! I think you have slipped on a banana peel and "bonked" your head or was it a quartz crystal, WC?
Not at all, it is your version of fact.
Check it for yourself.
 
Upvote 0

Inan3

Veteran Saint
Jul 22, 2007
3,376
88
West of the Mississippi
✟27,875.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This is what passes for creationist debate?

Why not that's what passes for evolutionists debates. What good for the goose.... Don't be so self righteous. You guys are such hypocrites.
 
Upvote 0

Inan3

Veteran Saint
Jul 22, 2007
3,376
88
West of the Mississippi
✟27,875.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Do you know who exposed the Piltdown Man fraud?

Of course I do, this is a classic evolutionary argument. Right out of the A/E Manual. Still doesn't make it right AND it's also scientists that have exposed todays so called "evidence" is wrong. So this your point? On second thought, I have heard it all before. Lies, deceit, twisting, condescention, etc. etc.
 
Upvote 0

Inan3

Veteran Saint
Jul 22, 2007
3,376
88
West of the Mississippi
✟27,875.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican


Oh a quote from the god of atheism. How sweet.
 
Upvote 0

Blayz

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2007
3,367
231
60
Singapore
✟4,827.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
No but evolutionists do who are their cousins?


If I am reading you right, you are accepting that evolutionists are cousins to orangutans?

Excellent! We have convinced you of the truth for at least some of the human race, now to just convince you of the rest!

Well done us!
 
Upvote 0

Tomk80

Titleless
Apr 27, 2004
11,570
429
45
Maastricht
Visit site
✟36,582.00
Faith
Agnostic
Do you know how many fossils have been found of Neanderthals and what state they were in? Can you give a guess?

Do you know how much of a skeleton we need to reconstrcuct it and why this is? Can you give a guess?

I would really like an answer to these, because I am really curious on what you think about this at this point in time.

Piltdown man indeed set back research on human origins for decades. Important finds like australopithicus fossils (some of our very early ancestors) were dismissed because of it. Yet even then there were scientists doubting the validity of the fossil. Do you realize that before it was uncovered as a fraud scienitsts already distanced themselves from the fossil more and more, because it didn't fit the rest of the evidence. Seems they were right, weren't they? And then an evolutionist anthropologist found it was a composite of three different animals. Why, if creationism is such a well-founded theory, didn't creationists uncover the hoax immediately? Why, if science is so unreliable and creationism so reliable, was it the scientists and not the creationists uncovering the hoax? Do you have any good answers for those questions?

I couldn't parse this paragraph. It really makes no logical sense to me.

Seriously you guys are just to full of yourselves. You must really be sick. Time to upchuck and you'll feel better. Or was that what you did in your post. No wonder it smelled so foul.
I think you are doing NailsII quite the disservice with this response. He made some good points that you should really address instead of wave away.
 
Upvote 0

lemmings

Veteran
Nov 5, 2006
2,587
132
California
✟25,969.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
“Today’s evidence” What year are you living in! Piltdown was exposed as a forgery over 50 years ago and in all likelyhood, before you where even born.
 
Upvote 0

NailsII

Life-long student of biological science
Jul 25, 2007
1,690
48
UK
✟17,147.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
What's wrong, you running out of evidence and you need to slate people to make yourself feel better?
Just remember, you're the one with the vivid imagination - a sky god you cannot see, touch or feel but is everywhere and all loving but kills people who don't agree with him or disobey him.
 
Upvote 0

LittleNipper

Contributor
Mar 9, 2005
9,011
174
MOUNT HOLLY, NEW JERSEY
✟10,660.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Just continue to not believe in HIM and see how your life doesn't go......
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.