• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

BrotherJJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2019
1,145
427
North America
✟196,571.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Have they submitted to the FDA for approval?
The Washington Post has an interesting article from December 30th on it. It sounds promising. There is a lack of clinical data on it. But I guess it is good enough for India right now.
 
Upvote 0

Ponderous Curmudgeon

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2021
1,477
944
67
Newfield
✟38,862.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
29,540
17,648
Here
✟1,558,235.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Well, the tricky part with this vaccine is that they'll likely to have to re-run their tests to gauge efficacy against Omicron (they were testing it against Delta), and based on other articles, it can't be modified as quickly to adjust to new variants should that need ever arise.

There's likely not any significant safety concerns with it, but with regards to whether or not it would be approved for use in the US, there really wouldn't be much of a point in the US of using up the FDA and CDC's time reviewing a 4th vaccine, when we already have 3 approved ones, they're no-cost to the US citizens who receive them, and we don't have a shortage.

It would likely be a lot of time & effort involved to get it approved for US use, and for what? So vaccine-hesitant folks could have a 4th kind they'd also refuse to take?

Doesn't make sense to introduce a 4th vaccine option (in a country that already has 3 decent options, and literally had such a large surplus, that we were having to throw millions of them away because people were refusing to take them)


I think they should just stay the course with what they're currently doing with this one, which is tailor this to be a solution for low-income countries that desperately want more vaccines, but can't afford the current options.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Well, the tricky part with this vaccine is that they'll likely to have to re-run their tests to gauge efficacy against Omicron (they were testing it against Delta), and based on other articles, it can't be modified as quickly to adjust to new variants should that need ever arise.

There's likely not any significant safety concerns with it, but with regards to whether or not it would be approved for use in the US, there really wouldn't be much of a point in the US of using up the FDA and CDC's time reviewing a 4th vaccine, when we already have 3 approved ones, they're no-cost to the US citizens who receive them, and we don't have a shortage.

It would likely be a lot of time & effort involved to get it approved for US use, and for what? So vaccine-hesitant folks could have a 4th kind they'd also refuse to take?

Doesn't make sense to introduce a 4th vaccine option (in a country that already has 3 decent options, and literally had such a large surplus, that we were having to throw millions of them away because people were refusing to take them)


I think they should just stay the course with what they're currently doing with this one, which is tailor this to be a solution for low-income countries that desperately want more vaccines, but can't afford the current options.

As you said the rest of the world needs to be vaccinated and we do not need to be pushing up the price for the rest of the world. I am hopeful for this new vaccine.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ThatRobGuy
Upvote 0