Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you have any objective measure as to why?It's not that hard to understand. A canine and a feline are not the same kind for example.
Do you have any objective measure as to why?
Where do you draw a line?
Is cat a kind? Is great cat a kind?
Are wolves and coyote's the same kind? How about foxes?
If all you have is unjustifiable conviction, then you shouldn't expect to be able to convince anyone else.
You can say it is not hard to understand kinds but you didn't define kinds or their limits. Don't feel badly about it. We recently had a topic here with a video of a debate: Dr. Kent Hovind vs. Dr. Dan Cardinale (Microevolution vs Macroevolution). Dr Kovind wasn't able to define kinds or where you draw the lines between kinds or common ancestry. From evolution we not only know that cats and dogs had a common ancestor but also we have a fair idea of what that ancestor looked like.It's not that hard to understand. A canine and a feline are not the same kind for example.
Then how did whales predate land animals?"After it's kind" in no way precludes evolution.
Kind = GenusYou can say it is not hard to understand kinds but you didn't define kinds or their limits.
Common ancestry is not responsible for macroevolution.Frank Robert said:Dr Kovind wasn't able to define kinds or where you draw the lines between kinds or common ancestry.
AIG claims that also but then there is a problem with it as many species within the genus do not hybridize.Kind = GenusCommon ancestry is not responsible for macroevolution.
Of course wolves and foxes and coyotes are the same kind.. this is basic biology.Do you have any objective measure as to why?
Where do you draw a line?
Is cat a kind? Is great cat a kind?
Are wolves and coyote's the same kind? How about foxes?
If all you have is unjustifiable conviction, then you shouldn't expect to be able to convince anyone else.
I would not be so quick to belittle imagination. I bet you are unaware of the symbiotic relationship between imagination and hard work. You only need to consider the consilience of evidence for the ToE due to hard work in many areas of biology such as anatomy, molecular biology, biogeography, fossils, developmental biology, ecology, genetics, morphology plus many others. Now if creationists did some the hard work of science and used their imaginations instead of disparaging those that do the rest of us would be able to take them seriously.Lol, sure we do... With a whole lot of imagination and 14 billion years thrown in you can come up with anything.
Kinds is a biblical term not a biological term.Of course wolves and foxes and coyotes are the same kind.. this is basic biology.
I thought science was supposed to be raw facts. If I can just use my imagination anything can be science.I would not be so quick to belittle imagination. I bet you are unaware of the symbiotic relationship between imagination and hard work. You only need to consider the consilience of evidence for the ToE due to hard work in many areas of biology such as anatomy, molecular biology, biogeography, fossils, developmental biology, ecology, genetics, morphology plus many others. Now if creationists did some the hard work of science and used their imaginations instead of disparaging those that do the rest of us would be able to take them seriously.
It must be GREAT to know all things perfectly! Does God approve of your perfected god-like knowledge?
I'm envious of your greatness. And that's a sin, I know. But you gotta admit it is an enviable thing for you to know all things perfectly.
A difference that makes the difference is that no one has read a chimp-authored study on the difference between humans and chimps. Chimps in the wild live exactly as their ancestors did across the millennia.Either way, are scientists today in any way close to explaining how natural selection acting on random mutation created the vast differences between chimps and humans?
Like deciding that a feline/ canine existed, when you can not produce current evidence that it's possible.You thought wrong.
Of course when you are willfully ignorant science can be anything you imagine it to be.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=berkeley+what+is+science
There is plenty of evidence from many different sources that you are impotent to accept because of religious beliefs. Just examine how your sources divert and deflect from DNA and fossils evidence.Like deciding that a feline/ canine existed, when you can not produce current evidence that it's possible.
We evolved from a common ancestor not from chimps.Which suggests that we didn't evolve from them.
The fossil evidence for the cat/ dog is a few teeth and ankle bones of an ancient fisher type animal. Pure speculation based an assumptions.There is plenty of evidence from many different sources that you are impotent to accept because of religious beliefs. Just examine how your sources divert and deflect from DNA and fossils evidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?