Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And so another google because you don't really understand, at least you gave a link this time. And from that link, the whole paragraph.Philosophy of Science 101.
Causal Determinism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Determinism is deeply connected with our understanding of the physical sciences and their explanatory ambitions, on the one hand, and with our views about human free action on the other.
As noted, QM challenges the principle. We await evo's to catch up on their reading.
QV:
Although the discovery of a missing link is cause for celebration, it is also cause for more and deeper studies. Ironically, even as one link is found, two new missing links are "created"—one the immediate ancestor and one the immediate descendent of the newly found creature.
Has a creationist ever offered up anything besides garbage?Nobody is obligated to respond to garbage.
I offer up nothing to begin with.Has a creationist ever offered up anything besides garbage?
Has a creationist ever offered up anything besides garbage?
You are not fooling anyone. How many "challenges" have you posted? I have never seen one that was not garbage and refuted on the first page. Usually in the first response the thread was effectively dead.I offer up nothing to begin with.
Maybe they are so naive they think it's legit and that it will foolQuote mined, per usual creo tactics.
Has a creationist ever offered up anything besides garbage?
I offer up nothing to begin with.
Um ... that kinda went over your head, didn't it?You are not fooling anyone. How many "challenges" have you posted? I have never seen one that was not garbage and refuted on the first page. Usually in the first response the thread was effectively dead.
No, your "bad". You have shown the uncanny ability to grasp the obvious. That which cannot be proven must be presumed. Think about it.In both of these general areas there is no agreement over whether determinism is true (or even whether it can be known true or false), and what the import for human agency would be in either case." My bold.
I have and so have many others, that's why scientific theories are provisional but you presume to know the answer even when you are wrong.No, your "bad". You have shown the uncanny ability to grasp the obvious. That which cannot be proven must be presumed. Think about it.
The "flying monkeys" are flooding my email with their usual drivel. The lonely crudman above is just an example.
Some wonder why atheists often frequent Christian web sites but the opposite is quite rare. Lurk an atheist website for the answer: they eat their own. I suppose they export their venom here to troll the threads in vain attempts to buff up their egos. Misery loves company. Sartre was right, for the atheist, “Hell is other people”.
Some wonder why atheists often frequent Christian web sites but the opposite is quite rare. Lurk an atheist website for the answer: they eat their own. I suppose they export their venom here to troll the threads in vain attempts to buff up their egos. Misery loves company. Sartre was right, for the atheist, “Hell is other people”.
No, you offered lass than nothing. Falsehoods are negative. Now what you should be asking is how do we know that the book of Genesis cannot be read literally. At all. From head to tail it has been debunked.Um ... that kinda went over your head, didn't it?
I offer up nothing.
Then comes a series of miracles over a period of six days that raises that nothing (i.e., level of mass/energy) from zero to its current level today.
The process is known as: creatio ex nihilo.
Creation out of nothing.
I'm here to deal with the pseudoscience. That's all.
Um ... that kinda went over your head, didn't it?
I offer up nothing.
Thanks for the QED.No, you offered less than nothing.
No, your "bad". You have shown the uncanny ability to grasp the obvious. That which cannot be proven must be presumed. Think about it.
The "flying monkeys" are flooding my email with their usual drivel. The lonely crudman above is just an example.
Some wonder why atheists often frequent Christian web sites but the opposite is quite rare. Lurk an atheist website for the answer: they eat their own. I suppose they export their venom here to troll the threads in vain attempts to buff up their egos. Misery loves company. Sartre was right, for the atheist, “Hell is other people”.
I don't think telling someone who knows more than you do that he is wrong constitutes knowing more than the person who knows more than you that you know more than he.There's no ego anywhere to beat than of a person
who thinks he is gifted with infallible Bible reading skill, and knows more than any researcher on earth.
Ya ... I just turn into the Hulk every time some "nasty atheist" lays some fact on me.Estrid said:How it must enrage someone to have such Imperious might challenged by those nasty atheists and their pesky facts.
No argument there.Estrid said:People shouldn't make false claims against science in an open forum if they can't handle being corrected and have to start lashing out.
Not a mutation but many mutations.In the animal kingdom, every sexual reproduction is a mutation.
Why is that a bad thing? The vast majority of mutations are neutral and neutral mutations that accumulate in genomes have an important long-term impact on the evolution.The vast majority do not confer a bendfit.
Another argument from ignorance.Rather than causal to evolution, the mutations are merely happenstance. Yes, w/o mutation no evolution can occur but elevating what chance provides as causal is like saying a pair of dice caused the player to roll snake eyes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?