Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Strawman. I have said probably three times now that Jesus was ignorant. Earlier you showed yourself unable to comprehend the word immutable. Now you can't seem to understand the word ignorant.Anyone who knows their Bible knows Jesus didn`t claim to be omniscient when He was in the flesh. You like gobbledygook so much that you should get a job running the Nickelodeon green slime machine.
Dictionary:I don`t even know what a hypostatic union is. I don`t see it in the creed I had to recite.
Strawman. I have said probably three times now that Jesus was ignorant. Earlier you showed yourself unable to comprehend the word immutable. Now you can't seem to understand the word ignorant.
Dictionary:
hy·po·stat·ic un·ion
/ˈˌhīpəˈˌstadik ˈyo͞onyən/
noun
THEOLOGY
- the combination of divine and human natures in the single person of Christ.
Basically:
1. Hypostasis. From a Greek word meaning substance, or nature, or person
2. Union. The joining of elements.
Thus the hypostatic union is the union of 2 natures, divine and human, constituting Christ.
Enough with the sanctimonious nonsense. Being an infant is by definition a state of ignorance, especially when considered RELATIVE to the state of infinite knowledge.The next time you refer to God in a derogatory way will be the last time I talk to you. I`m surprised you haven`t been banned.
Enough with the sanctimonious nonsense. Being an infant is by definition a state of ignorance, especially when considered RELATIVE to the state of infinite knowledge.
When I refer to an infant as ignorant of many things, I'm not insulting him. I'm simply making a statement of fact.
If you want to use that sham of an excuse to bow of out of a debate with me, don't pretend you're fooling anyone.
And by the way, as I noted earlier, the whole mainstream Doctrine of God, when fully extrapolated, is tantamount to a derogatory statement about God. I have demonstrated that fact on other threads, perhaps I might take the time to do it here as well.The next time you refer to God in a derogatory way will be the last time I talk to you. I`m surprised you haven`t been banned.
Look, compared to infinite knowledge, it's still a relatively ignorant state. Spare me the sanctimony. On a debate forum, we use language that is clear and convenient to save time. I don't think God is offended by that.There is apocrypha that says Jesus talked when He was an infant
And by the way, as I noted earlier, the whole mainstream Doctrine of God, when fully extrapolated, is tantamount to a derogatory statement about God. I have demonstrated that fact on other threads, perhaps I might take the time to do it here as well.
Look, compared to infinite knowledge, it's still a relatively ignorant state. Spare me the sanctimony. On a debate forum, we use language that is clear and convenient to save time. I don't think God is offended by that.
Probably not. The attitude around here seems to be, "I'm already convinced of my position. Don't confuse me with the facts!"Will anyone read it?
Have fun explaining to God why you insulted Him your entire Christian life. Nobody forced you to accept the doctrines of men. That was YOUR decision.For your sake I hope not, I would never do it.
Have fun explaining to God why you insulted Him your entire Christian life. Nobody forced you to accept the doctrines of men. That was YOUR decision.
Probably not. The attitude around here seems to be, "I'm already convinced of my position. Don't confuse me with the facts!"
I'm certainly not aware of having done so.Right. You would never do that?
A moment ago you seemed to insinuate that you wouldn't even bother to read it!Can you explain what that means?
I'm certainly not aware of having done so.
A moment ago you seemed to insinuate that you wouldn't even bother to read it!
And even if you did read it, what's the predictable outcome? I haven't yet seen a degree of intellectual honesty on this thread that would AT LEAST admit that some of the traditional doctrines are PROBLEMATICAL. All I've seen is a 100% state of denial up to this point.
So why bother?
And then you remain in a state of denial. Let's contrast this with my approach. A while back Bible Highlighter made an excellent argument about a parent infecting their child with a drug-addiction. I immediately acknowledged that it was a significant objection - I at least admitted it was a real PROBLEM that MERITS attention and resolution.I asked you if you thought anyone would read it. Me, I read every post on my threads, even yours.
And then you remain in a state of denial. Let's contrast this with my approach. A while back Bible Highlighter made an excellent argument about a parent infecting their child with a drug-addiction. I immediately acknowledged that it was a significant objection - I at least admitted it was a real PROBLEM that MERITS attention and resolution.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?