Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's not actual evidence until you show it. You do know documents can be faked. I plead guilty to being a cynic and untrusting of the cult of climate change.
Appears you have an extremely short memory. I was clear in a prior comment that the 97% were climate scientists who where actively investigating and publishing their research results.False! 97% is false and if you take out the money scared hacks it is even lower.Fact Checking The Claim Of 97% Consensus On Anthropogenic Climate Change
Belief in the scientific community in human-caused climate change is clearly below 97%, a close review of the evidence shows, but the claim continues to be widely publicized and defended. Would a lower level of consensus convince anyone concerned about global warming to change their views?www.forbes.com
It is not difficult to discern who among us have actual knowledge as opposed to those who are faking it.It's not actual evidence until you show it. You do know documents can be faked. I plead guilty to being a cynic and untrusting of the cult of climate change.
I posted a video of Tucker reporting on climate change and you respond with an election diversion???????Yes, they were reporting the truth that the 2020 election was stolen.
Yes I did. It points directly to Tucker's veracity and willingness to feed disinformation to his viewers.I posted a video of Tucker reporting on climate change and you respond with an election diversion???????
We are not, I repeat, we are not able to change the direction that climate is taking, the worse has already been baked in. We can make sacrifices in our life style that might delay it somewhat or perhaps make it less severe for future generations.Challenge: If climate change is the dire desaster claimed by many why are not posters here telling of all they are doing to combat what they believe is destroying mankind. Maybe we can have pledges to trade cars for bicycles. turn off the lights, eat bugs, give up current lifestyles for greener ones. After all believing in something so vehemently should produce some kind of major lifestyle correction.
I am reminded of a recent gathering of millionaires who support the rich pay more in taxes, when they were ask to pledge sending a check to the IRS they ALL declined.
Come on guys if you believe this stuff with all of your being lets hear of the personal sacrifice you are making to save humanity.
But what have you done ? If you have not done what you are preaching you have no right or grounds to call me out for not believing the cultish nonsense.Many people have cut back on energy use but there is no need to say hey "look at me." Deniers wear their denial as a badge, in large part, to justify maintaining a wasteful lifestyle.
Actually you showed you are not interested in truth on this topic because the video stands or falls on the content not your option of Tucker.Yes I did. It points directly to Tucker's veracity and willingness to feed disinformation to his viewers.
A intelligent or knowledgeable person would actually weigh the merit of what was said.Do you really expect any intelligent or knowledgeable person to take serious or give a hoot about what Tucker claims?
I posted a video of Tucker reporting on climate change and you respond with an election diversion???????
Nice to to know you now have a diploma relative to Tuckers credibility. You have deemed him not credible so case is tried, convicted and closed. Do you really wonder why I don’t regard some of your post credible? I’ll save you time I am fully aware you feel the same.Tucker is not a credible person. Period. It is not worth anyone's time to take apart the distortions and lies in his presentations. I spent several hours ripping apart a different 5 minute video. Not going to do it again.
Nice to to know you now have a diploma relative to Tuckers credibility. You have deemed him not credible so case is tried, convicted and closed. Do you really wonder why I don’t regard some of your post credible? I’ll save you time I am fully aware you feel the same.
What?So many names over the years to finally get to climate change and convince some people to that taxing the weather is needed to save the planet.
Fair enough so then you are not qualified to dispute what you haven’t seen.Videos are also really bad ways to argue a point on a discussion board. I generally don't watch *any* of them.
Fair enough so then you are not qualified to dispute what you haven’t seen.
Your going to Tucker Carlson for authority on the climate?!?
We are witnessing the "cult of climate". Inconvenient facts. Some of the prophets of doom in their own words.
Your going to Tucker Carlson for authority on the climate?!?
Is this a joke or something?
If that's truly your go to for truth, you have lost all credibility!
Didn't astronomers "go to" Clyde Tombaugh for truth?
That would be like climatologists going to Arrhenius. The big problem with Arrhenius and Tombaugh is that both are dead. They were also subject matter experts. Tucker is neither.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?