Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
What “is” a radio signal-?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dig4truth" data-source="post: 73125577" data-attributes="member: 357420"><p>Well, the "profound" part is the only thing I agree with you about. I do hear the disdain in the tone of your posts for anyone who thinks other than you. </p><p></p><p>And no, it is you who must decide the origin of matter. I already know the origin. </p><p></p><p>Going from zygote to adult takes what? Come on you can say it, programming! There, I knew you could. </p><p></p><p>What does programming require though? I'll wait... a Programmer! Right again. </p><p></p><p>What would happen to a plant without the programming to handle the sun's energy? It's called toast. </p><p></p><p>Since you challenge me to come up with an example of "nothing" (<em>which is not possible after the material universe has already been created - and is a misnomer because God being eternal has always existed and He is not nothing!</em>) one might assume that you believe that something must be eternal. What would that be? Can you give me an example of it? If not then I'll just assume you believe in something eternal. </p><p></p><p>Scientism is so illogical and yet it puffs itself up like a king looking down on his subjects. It cannot explain the origin of matter or the complexity of life, much less how life even arose and yet it's arrogance is on display for all to see.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dig4truth, post: 73125577, member: 357420"] Well, the "profound" part is the only thing I agree with you about. I do hear the disdain in the tone of your posts for anyone who thinks other than you. And no, it is you who must decide the origin of matter. I already know the origin. Going from zygote to adult takes what? Come on you can say it, programming! There, I knew you could. What does programming require though? I'll wait... a Programmer! Right again. What would happen to a plant without the programming to handle the sun's energy? It's called toast. Since you challenge me to come up with an example of "nothing" ([I]which is not possible after the material universe has already been created - and is a misnomer because God being eternal has always existed and He is not nothing![/I]) one might assume that you believe that something must be eternal. What would that be? Can you give me an example of it? If not then I'll just assume you believe in something eternal. Scientism is so illogical and yet it puffs itself up like a king looking down on his subjects. It cannot explain the origin of matter or the complexity of life, much less how life even arose and yet it's arrogance is on display for all to see. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
What “is” a radio signal-?
Top
Bottom