Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
What “is” a radio signal-?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dig4truth" data-source="post: 73122345" data-attributes="member: 357420"><p>As an atheist I can understand why you would want to begin with an assumption of no God. However, that places you in the unenviable position of beginning with illogical claims. </p><p></p><p>Where did matter come from? "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" would sufficiently explain it. </p><p></p><p>But without an eternal source you are left with something (matter) from nothing. Can't happen - illogical! </p><p></p><p>Look closer at the beauty and precision of the Word of God:</p><p></p><p>In the beginning (<strong>time</strong>)</p><p>God created (<strong>energy</strong>)</p><p>The heavens (<strong>space</strong>)</p><p>And the earth (<strong>matter</strong>) </p><p></p><p>Now you may attempt to use pseudo-scientific phraseology like, "nothing is not really nothing" like Krauss but in the end it is just nonsense. Either there was something eternal or there can be nothing because nothing can produce nothing. </p><p></p><p>Then we must assume, by rejecting God, that simple forms became more structured and complex. When we obviously observe that organization tends toward entropy. </p><p></p><p>Scientology is the new religion built upon nothing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dig4truth, post: 73122345, member: 357420"] As an atheist I can understand why you would want to begin with an assumption of no God. However, that places you in the unenviable position of beginning with illogical claims. Where did matter come from? "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" would sufficiently explain it. But without an eternal source you are left with something (matter) from nothing. Can't happen - illogical! Look closer at the beauty and precision of the Word of God: In the beginning ([B]time[/B]) God created ([B]energy[/B]) The heavens ([B]space[/B]) And the earth ([B]matter[/B]) Now you may attempt to use pseudo-scientific phraseology like, "nothing is not really nothing" like Krauss but in the end it is just nonsense. Either there was something eternal or there can be nothing because nothing can produce nothing. Then we must assume, by rejecting God, that simple forms became more structured and complex. When we obviously observe that organization tends toward entropy. Scientology is the new religion built upon nothing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
What “is” a radio signal-?
Top
Bottom