Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
In that case the Flood is not up for debate. The Flood was agreed upon by all Nicene scholars as well as Ante-Nicene fathers and up to our present day modern scholars. Since Jesus Christ said the Flood happened then debating the Flood on this topic is a violation of this forum.
Matthew 24:37-39 King James Version (KJV)
37 But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark,
39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
If you don't agree with what Jesus says here than you don't agree with Jesus at all. Again, many atheists like to write "Christian" on their profile so they can come here and preach atheism. But it don't work because Jesus is the word made flesh and what He says is the last and final word.
Therefore the Flood is a fact.
Can you say more about this?There's the points about specious reasoning brought up by other posters, but there's also the fact there's no ancient literature depicting a literal ancient worldwide flood
None whatsoever
There is, however, an overwhelming abundance of literature , pre-Biblical, that use the terms " flood / deluge " to refer to various astronomical events like new moons and eclipses, as well as " High Priests " and their office/s
There's also the rather obvious fact that the flood narrative in the Bible is based on the same astronomy knowledge of the earlier priests, but since hardly anybody actually studies the literature containing mathematical astronomy of the Mesopotamian priesthoods, it's a topic that seems out of reach for most
It would be good if evolution were actually science imo.
Those who refuse to believe God's account of Noah's flood will also try to explain away why there is no long term erosion between the layers in the Grand Canyon
which was actually formed in a very fast moving water type flooding.
People may believe in God without agreeing to the inerrancy of the Bible theory.It would be good if evolution were actually science imo.
Those who refuse to believe God's account of Noah's flood will also try to explain away why there is no long term erosion between the layers in the Grand Canyon, which was actually formed in a very fast moving water type flooding. Go figure?
I doubt that one would find a whole skeleton of anything in an uplift ... like those who refuse the flood account believe. Takes a lot of faith for that imo
Evolution is the observed phenomenon. Evolutionary theory is the scientific theory that explains it. Common descent is one of the consequences of evolution.
The Coconino sandstone is made of great deposits of eroded rock, forming desert dunes, which were subsequently buried and hardened.
How did this get formed in soft sediment by very fast moving water?
And you know all this how? The internet? I own all these ancient accounts and all the ones that have all or most of the story still in tact say it was a global Flood! And the dating of these documents is irrelevant since the Biblical account is the only ark that will survive the deluge and keep afloat. We know the deluge happened. Therefore the true account is gonna hold water. As for the rest of your assumptions, well...you assume many things as most atheists do without ever actually reading these ancient accounts which sternly disagree with atheists.
Can you say more about this?
Its interesting that not only have marine fossils been discovered at the peaks of all mountains in the world, but also how large whale fossils been discovered high up in the Andes mountains.
This subject is twofold because first there is the major problem of explaining fossilization without a cause if one wants to go with the poor uplift excuse. Then, perhaps, the other problem is explaining why a whale didn't move during an uplift and got stuck during the rising up of the uplift and then became a fossil?
So atheists, have at it.
The only thing that drown in the Israelites flood myth was common sense! Seems they were having difficulty tracing their blood lines back to Adam when they were appropriating Mesopotamian history, so they drown the whole world to fill the gap!Those whales might be stranded there when the Noah flood covered the mountains.
How long did this canyon form?
How long did this canyon form?
Its interesting that not only have marine fossils been discovered at the peaks of all mountains in the world, but also how large whale fossils been discovered high up in the Andes mountains.
This subject is twofold because first there is the major problem of explaining fossilization without a cause if one wants to go with the poor uplift excuse. Then, perhaps, the other problem is explaining why a whale didn't move during an uplift and got stuck during the rising up of the uplift and then became a fossil?
So atheists, have at it.
It would be good if evolution were actually science imo.
It's good to know the truth personally and not have to go along with what the world tells us...............You're telling thousands upon thousands of scientists that they don't have the first idea about what it is they do for a living, after all. That takes considerable, well, gumption. So you'd better have a pretty solid standing as a scientist to be making that kind of claim.
The rare mountain hump back.Any idea what species of whale it was?
Really ?
OK then, explain Sin-leqi-unninni's use of astronomy notations
Evolution is the observed phenomenon. Evolutionary theory is the scientific theory that explains it. Common descent is one of the consequences of evolution.
The Coconino sandstone is made of great deposits of eroded rock, forming desert dunes, which were subsequently buried and hardened.
How did this get formed in soft sediment by very fast moving water?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?