So where did the original huskies come from? Are you saying that huskies were a separately created kind?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do some research - answer your own questions, which you should already know before you even start making claims on subjects you apparently know nothing of.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Husky
"Husky type dogs originally were landrace breeds kept by Arctic indigenous peoples.[8] DNA analysis has found that Huskies are one of the oldest types of dog, although one researcher "questioned the assignment of dogs to the ancient breed group, saying that any recent crossbreeding with wolves, as has happened with malamutes and Siberian huskies, could make a breed look primitive." [9]
Examples of these landraces in modern times have been selectively bred and registered with various kennel clubs as modern purebred breeds, including the Siberian Husky from Russia (Siberia) and Greenland Dog from Greenland. The Sakhalin Husky is a Japanese sled dog related to the Japanese Spitz and Akita Inu."
But since you also know dog breeds just don't magically pop into existence through spontaneous generation - you should know they had parents. Oh that's right, you still believe in spontaneous generation - my bad.
No sir... YOU are the one making the claim here. I am mearly asking you to support that claim. I assume that your non-response means you cannot. Another baseless creationist assertion made up based on his/her presumptions which are in turn based on ideology and dogma... rather than facts.All all you present as usual in defense is more "claims" that everyone else is always wrong - yet you supply not one shred of science.
So where did the original huskies come from? Are you saying that huskies were a separately created kind?
No sir... YOU are the one making the claim here. I am mearly asking you to support that claim. I assume that your non-response means you cannot. Another baseless creationist assertion made up based on his/her presumptions which are in turn based on ideology and dogma... rather than facts.
That would irreconcilable with the side-to-side movement of fish and lizards.
It would be similar to a single mammal species growing feathers instead of fur.
It would be a violation of the nested hierarchy.
Your answer was right there in the post, you just chose not to read anything so you could continue with your strawman.
I present four evidences for whale evolution, two genetic, one physiological and one embryological.
1. If whales evolved from land mammals we would expect them to have numerous physical characteristics including a mammalian jaw. We indeed find those characteristics one of which is the up and down movement characteristic of mammals in contrast with the side to side movement of reptiles and fish. if whales were specially created they could just as easily move side to side and have a vertical tail fluke as opposed to a horizontal one (see Ichthyosaurs).
2. Cetacean embryos develop hind limb buds that are absorbed (except in cases of atavisms) during fetal development. This is due the interaction of two genes that normally would grow hind limbs (see below). If cetaceans never lived on the land, why do they develop limb buds during the embryonic stage?
http://etb-whales.blogspot.com/2012/03/dolphin-hind-legs-hind-limb-bud-images.html
3. The sleek, hydrodynamic bodies of whales are due to a broken interaction between the genes Sonic Hedgehog and Hand2. Hand2 normally grows hind limbs in terrestrial mammals. If cetaceans didn't evolve from terrestrial mammals, why do they have the Hand2 gene?
http://news.ufl.edu/archive/2006/05...-legs-got-sleek-and-conquered-the-oceans.html
4. The evolution of cetacean forelimbs into flippers is controlled by two genes - Hoxd12 and Hoxd13.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19074008
These are just 4 of the many evidences making whale evolution one of the most compelling and supported lineages we can look at.
What's the ID explanation for these observations?
I don't understand. Are you saying it would be impossible for marine mammals to gradually "evolve" side-to-side movement similar to that seen in fish? I'd love to hear your explanation for that.
"The designer designed it that way for reasons entirely sufficient to the designer." Why do people keep asking this question?I'll ask again. What is the ID explanation for the observations in the OP?
As ever, there is nothing but conjecture. Not a shred of empirical evidence. No one would ever become an evolutionist if he had true scientific scruples and awareness that not one proof is ever offered... sighI present four evidences for whale evolution, two genetic, one physiological and one embryological.
1. If whales evolved from land mammals we would expect them to have numerous physical characteristics including a mammalian jaw. We indeed find those characteristics one of which is the up and down movement characteristic of mammals in contrast with the side to side movement of reptiles and fish. if whales were specially created they could just as easily move side to side and have a vertical tail fluke as opposed to a horizontal one (see Ichthyosaurs).
2. Cetacean embryos develop hind limb buds that are absorbed (except in cases of atavisms) during fetal development. This is due the interaction of two genes that normally would grow hind limbs (see below). If cetaceans never lived on the land, why do they develop limb buds during the embryonic stage?
http://etb-whales.blogspot.com/2012/03/dolphin-hind-legs-hind-limb-bud-images.html
3. The sleek, hydrodynamic bodies of whales are due to a broken interaction between the genes Sonic Hedgehog and Hand2. Hand2 normally grows hind limbs in terrestrial mammals. If cetaceans didn't evolve from terrestrial mammals, why do they have the Hand2 gene?
http://news.ufl.edu/archive/2006/05...-legs-got-sleek-and-conquered-the-oceans.html
4. The evolution of cetacean forelimbs into flippers is controlled by two genes - Hoxd12 and Hoxd13.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19074008
These are just 4 of the many evidences making whale evolution one of the most compelling and supported lineages we can look at.
As ever, there is nothing but conjecture. Not a shred of empirical evidence. No one would ever become an evolutionist if he had true scientific scruples and awareness that not one proof is ever offered... sigh
Funny how the only people with scientific scruples are those who form a minuscule minority in the relevant disciplines, rarely if ever publish in peer review and even then typically only in lower-tier journals, and never contribute anything useful to humanity's understanding of the universe. How does that work?As ever, there is nothing but conjecture. Not a shred of empirical evidence. No one would ever become an evolutionist if he had true scientific scruples and awareness that not one proof is ever offered... sigh
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?