Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Let's not bring the crown into the circus, eh?
And you and all your sci-fi brethren agree on how the moon was formed?
You assume what you want -- I'll assume what I want.Then let's not assume two people had anything to do with eachother just because they lived in the same era, eh?
So you're just gunna assume things to be true that you have no reason to believe?
Then what's your beef with '30,000 different interpretations' -- (like that's even true)?We all agree that we don't know for certain which model of the moon's formation is the correct one.
So you're just gunna assume things to be true that you have no reason to believe?
Then what's your beef with '30,000 different interpretations' -- (like that's even true)?
I went out of my way to phrase that as a QUESTION: 77So you're just gunna assume things to be true that you have no reason to believe?
I'll ask a second time: What's your beef with 30,000 different interpretations?Because each of those 30k interpretations claim to be the inerrent, total and complete "Truth", and that their interpretation of the Bible is the correct one - all the others are wrong. Many of them try to push their beliefs on others and force people to live their lives according to what they believe.
AV, why do you bother talking to people here? You don't seem to care what anyone thinks, don't care about accuracy of your beliefs, don't care to be challenged on yours, don't care to learn about other people's beliefs and in general don't seem to be interested in any self-growth.I went out of my way to phrase that as a QUESTION: 77
So you think what you want -- your opinions can take a hike.
Oh I'm not. It is rare to see it openly admitted though. How often is it that someone says "I don't care what the evidence says, I'll believe and assume whatever I feel like." Do they expect to be taken seriously on anything after that ever again?Don't tell me you're just now figuring this out.
Then what's your beef with '30,000 different interpretations' -- (like that's even true)?
Then your point -- that there's 30,000 different interpretations -- can take a hike.Because each of those 30,000 denominations claim they have the truth.
I'll ask a second time: What's your beef with 30,000 different interpretations?
I'm not interested about those who claim there's is the right one -- else even two different interpretations would make your point.
You guys emphasize "30,000" -- (the lie, by the way, is 38,000) -- but you guys place your emphasis on the number, not the claim.
So, once again, what's your beef with "30,000"?
Then your point -- that there's 30,000 different interpretations -- can take a hike.
Because each of those 30,000 denominations claim they have the truth. Whereas, in science, there can easily be multiple hypothesis because they are supposed to be hypothetical. That's the difference.
Then this post:You're really going to avoid the point of the discussion by hanging on the number we used? You can do that if you want, but it actually hurts your case considering I gave a huge underestimation.
Point:
Multiple hypothesis is OK because each one is hypothetical.
Multiple denominations are not OK because each of the 38,000 claims to have the inerrant absolute truth, all different from each other.
This means criticizing science, as a Christian, on the basis that there are multiple hypothesis regarding lunar origins is absurdly illogical.
... can take a hike.Is that right?
Yeah I guess that's why there's 30,000 different ways to interpret the Theory of Evolution.... Oh wait... That's the bible.
Why don't you ask Ray Comfort if he believes the same creation story as Kent Hovind or Ken Ham?
You respond to a statement about how different hypothesis can exist for the same point because none claim to be true but merely possibilities by listing possibilities and then you claim you have demonstrated that the statement is incorrect?That's incorrect. A man claims that ERVs are evidence of common descent, another says that it shows no such thing, one claims red shift is the result of expansion another says it's not, one man claims that a compass needle moves as a result of magnetic fields, another can says it's the wind, a visiblist can say it's a future visible cause.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?