- Feb 12, 2005
- 7,554
- 130
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
My roommate is currently going to college because of the help of financial aid. He plans on moving off campus, and living in an apartment that is going to be more expensive than what he is paying now. He came back from work tonight and and said he had this big plan of going on welfare in order to pay for his food next year. I told him that it is wrong to do this, and he got all mad because my family is very well off. His argument was that the government is paying for him to eat now, so what is the difference. I haven't gotten to tell him this, because the argument got nasty in other parts related but unrelated to the issue, but the money he gets through financial aid does not come from the same place as where welfare comes from. So, if he was accepted into the program, he could be depriving an individual or a family of their need for food stamps. Do you guys think this is morally right, when he can stay on campus and not have to be on welfare?
