Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
We need a two-pronged attack to get a sane medical system
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Josheb" data-source="post: 74095155" data-attributes="member: 345061"><p>I certainly don't want to be guilty of a no true scotsman fallacy so let's not insinuate that into my position.</p><p></p><p>My argument is simple: There is no scriptural basis for this and there is no Constitutional basis for this.</p><p></p><p>Maybe I'm wrong so I asked: what is the scriptural basis? No one has given an exegtical argument to that inquiry. The attempts grossly abused scripture. That is objectively evident for all to read. What's the Constitutional basis? The "general welfare clauses," which have been abused by the left to expand government in direct conflict with the limits the Constitution expressly sets. If government-run medical care and insurance has no basis in scripture and no basis in the Constitution then we are not being response on either account. I'm open to a rational case but the ones so far all prove fallacious.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Josheb, post: 74095155, member: 345061"] I certainly don't want to be guilty of a no true scotsman fallacy so let's not insinuate that into my position. My argument is simple: There is no scriptural basis for this and there is no Constitutional basis for this. Maybe I'm wrong so I asked: what is the scriptural basis? No one has given an exegtical argument to that inquiry. The attempts grossly abused scripture. That is objectively evident for all to read. What's the Constitutional basis? The "general welfare clauses," which have been abused by the left to expand government in direct conflict with the limits the Constitution expressly sets. If government-run medical care and insurance has no basis in scripture and no basis in the Constitution then we are not being response on either account. I'm open to a rational case but the ones so far all prove fallacious. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
We need a two-pronged attack to get a sane medical system
Top
Bottom