Hans Blaster
Hood was a loser.
- Mar 11, 2017
- 21,588
- 16,290
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
I know the stupid word games you were playing and I refused to fall for your trap.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I know the stupid word games you were playing and I refused to fall for your trap.I know. That was actually a few questions. I extended the question to include other things also. Wouldn't a scientist pick up on that? Doh! lol.
Relatively new.Rocket surgeon? Is that new or did I miss that before?
Nope, never heard of him.If you're a PHD in Physics then surely you heard of Bruce Lipton?
Is he some sort of physicist?WHat do you think of him?
Now that darwinism is already debunked, I am looking forward to reading Dr. Stephen Meyers new book:
Stephen C. Meyer
Dr. Stephen C. Meyer received his PhD from the University of Cambridge in the philosophy of science. A former geophysicist and college professor, he now directs the Center for Science and Culture at…www.discovery.org
.
You should defiantly get the book, instead asking me about what someone else wrote, how scientific is that....
The good news is you will be hearing a lot form him and other top Scientists in the near future.
"Meyer argues that theism—with its affirmation of a transcendent, intelligent and active creator—best explains the evidence we have concerning biological and cosmological origins. Previously Meyer refrained from attempting to answer questions about “who” might have designed life. Now he provides an evidence-based answer to perhaps the ultimate mystery of the universe."
You have a serious propensity for dishonesty.Well that's how you talk. So what. SO I responded in kind. Ok so now it's two ways, Lol!
Big deal. Can't take a ribbing? Lol. I'm a retired Plumber. Go ahead and make some plumber jokes, I don't care. I wont play the Victim card. You aint the first mathmetician I've ever made fun of. Grow a pair man.
The "Return-God-Hypothesis-Scientific-Discoveries" makes no testable hypothesis. Here is a review of the book by Puck Mendelssohn.Now that darwinism is already debunked, I am looking forward to reading Dr. Stephen Meyers new book:
Stephen C. Meyer
Dr. Stephen C. Meyer received his PhD from the University of Cambridge in the philosophy of science. A former geophysicist and college professor, he now directs the Center for Science and Culture at…www.discovery.org
.
He most certainly does exist. Puck (not his real name) is an attorney. You can personally interact with him at the Peaceful Science forum where he frequently comments. If you want to know more about him but don't care to interact with him, you can check out his comments there. My guess is that you won't.Again with what someone else said ........... if that is how you guys do science, well good luck to you.
Puck Mendelssohn does not even exist.
If you read his comments you would might realize that he is quite knowledgeable about science.Thank you - you guessed right, why would I care about what someone else says about Dr. Meyers book, an attorney no less.
That may very well be but you don't need to be a scientist to know that Meyers' book about an hypothesis does not contain a testable hypothesis. If you haven't bought the book you could spend the money on a book that contains real science.I am willing to bet Dr. Stephen Meyers has more certificates, credentials, than everyone put together who has posted in this thread.
Hilarious.Thank you - you guessed right, why would I care about what someone else says about Dr. Meyers book, an attorney no less.
I am willing to bet Dr. Stephen Meyers has more certificates, credentials, than everyone put together who has posted in this thread.
Anyone can say something about it. It's not like his work is that sophisticated. His primary audience accepts the word of the DI.Thank you - you guessed right, why would I care about what someone else says about Dr. Meyers book, an attorney no less.
Do you like losing? SJ already responded, and I'm pretty sure you know his credentials are just as good as Meyer on a "degree level" basis. I've got the same trio of degrees as Meyer, undergraduate, masters, doctoral. I have no idea what his undergrad degree is in, but it's from some bible college. The post-graduate degrees in my closet are in Physics, Meyer's are in philosophy. He is no scientist and he never was. Perhaps the saddest thing about Meyer is that his "philosophy" material is regularly disassembled by well read amateurs on YouTube. (There are a few others floating around CF with more relevant Ph.D. in biology and geology, but I don't think they've been in this thread.)I am willing to bet Dr. Stephen Meyers has more certificates, credentials, than everyone put together who has posted in this thread.
I am not an atheist but even a non-atheist knows that anyone connecting atheist with science or labeling science as fake don't know what they are talking about.It is obvious that the atheist world view is falling apart (can no longer be supported even by their fake science) and that the truth will be known, why they seem a little more antagonistic than usual.
If the "rational intelligence" you are referring to was not the proximate cause of the universe, etc but the ultimate cause. If he were the ultimate cause there would be no need for fine-tuning. You also wouldn't need to choose between modern science and biblical faith.Another Professor that has been out and about recently, John Lennox:
"Although science with all of its power cannot address some of the fundamental questions that we ask, nevertheless the universe contains certain clues as to our relationship to it, clues that are scientifically accessible. The rational intelligibility of the universe, for instance, points to the existence of a Mind that was responsible both for the universe and for our minds. It is for this reason that we are able to do science and to discover the beautiful mathematical structures that underlie the phenomena we can observe. Not only that, but our increasing insight into the fine-tuning of the universe in general, and of planet earth in particular, is consistent with the widespread awareness that we are meant to be here."
Well, not "we" but the ones appointed , the ones Jesus identifies...Idk if you are a christian, but scripture says that even now we are seated in heavenly places with the Lord. How can that be possible if we are here? Well it was the Matrix movie that gave us the clue.
Proven? Yes.labeling science as fake
I have no idea what you are trying to say.Possible? No.
Proven? Yes.
By hollywood or bollywood.....
anything else needed to be said ?
Then with everything said, I still have to go back too:
Romans 1:22
Professing to be wise, they became fools,
Then with everything said, I still have to go back too:
Romans 1:22
Professing to be wise, they became fools,
His first evidence is that words exist?I will admit, I am not very persuasive and am at times a stiff necked person when interacting with others.
John Lennox is very persuasive, he argues the atheist has more faith than the theist. Similar to a quote from Lee Strobel:
View attachment 336319
In this recent interview with John Lennox explains why:
The REASON We Exist & Scientific PROOF Of God
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?