Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The evidence is in God's Earthly Creation which does make it listening to God.
When listening to the Earth, is that what you hear?Is this what you hear?
Romans 8:22 For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.
The evidence is in God's Earthly Creation which does make it listening to God.
The Earth is a Creation of God. Right? As such, what the Earth is showing us about itSelf is from God. Unless of course, God is deceiving us, which I kind of doubt in a major way.And how did you come to this conclusion ?
The Earth is a Creation of God. Right? As such, what the Earth is showing us about itSelf is from God.
The Earth is a Creation of God. Right? As such, what the Earth is showing us about itSelf is from God. Unless of course, God is deceiving us, which I kind of doubt in a major way.
What evidence ? You shouldn't be listening to men you should be listening to God.
I get this but what has this to do with Darwinism being from God ?
It's not his theory any more. Darwin had the initial insight, but since then new evidence and new research has moved science beyond what Darwin ever thought of. It wasn't even only Darwin who was working on the idea, it's just that he happened to be the one who published first. If it wasn't for that you might now be complaining about something you called "Wallacism." named after Darwin's contemporary Alfred Russel Wallace.If he can't understand genetics enough to understand race, what the unholy heck is anyone paying attention to his theories about creations species and even type. His conclusions prove his lack of understanding genetics in always.
. Looks like garbage in garbage out to me..It's not his theory any more. Darwin had the initial insight, but since then new evidence and new research has moved science beyond what Darwin ever thought of. It wasn't even only Darwin who was working on the idea, it's just that he happened to be the one who published first. If it wasn't for that you might now be complaining about something you called "Wallacism." named after Darwin's contemporary Alfred Russel Wallace.
. Looks like garbage in garbage out to me..
A true believer.. Yet God did know and does know . Still no one asks Him. Because if they knew , it would destroy the magic of evolution.The dude was from the age where no-one knew about genetics! What did you expect? But the amazing thing about science is that people can take earlier ideas, along with new information gained, and then build on them. That's how science works!
And science shows that Darwin was, in the fundamentals, correct.
A true believer.. Yet God did know and does know . Still no one asks Him. Because if they knew , it would destroy the magic of evolution.
And in Revelations he says to the last church age.. that he was there for creation. He surely does not seem happy in his correcting them. They must believe just like you . And he knows how DNA works. And not one 8n the Dna studies has asked him how He did it. Or he would provide any with all the proof they might want.
Does that thought create awe in you? it surely does not create awe in me. I worship an awesome God.. who made us and is the only one who can fix us. And I have been broke and fixed quite a few times. So I will continue to worship a complete God.. who wouldn't leave his creation broken but intends to fix all of it one way or the other.He created things through evolution.
Does that thought create awe in you? it surely does not create awe in me. I worship an awesome God.. who made us and is the only one who can fix us. And I have been broke and fixed quite a few times. So I will continue to worship a complete God.. who wouldn't leave his creation broken but intends to fix all of it one way or the other.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?