Walz v Vance

[Bradskii]

I'm giving it to Walz. It was pretty close. 60 - 40. I would have gone 55 - 45...no I will go with 55 - 45.

 

[Danthemailman]

I'm giving it to Vance.

x.com

x.com

Regardless, I was happy to see a civilized debate for a change.

 

[Postvieww]

In no real world did Waltz win that debate. Only those blinded by liberalism would dare to claim such!

 

[SavedByGrace3]

I am giving it to those who turn off the microphones. Otherwise, Vance did an excellent job fact-checking the moderators. Vance was quick on his feet, prepared well, and won the night. Waltz looked discombobulated and confused and could not keep up.
It's funny that the liberal media reacted to Vance's fact-checking the female moderator as "mansplaining." It is the feminist version of playing the race card.

 

[Akita Suggagaki]

Regardless, I was happy to see a civilized debate for a change.

How refreshing it was without Trump. I could maybe vote for Vance without Trump.

So was Walz at Tiananmen Square? No, he "misspoke"

What is in the Wisconsin Bill related to abortions and live birth? This bill requires any health care provider present at the time an abortion or attempted abortion results in a child born alive to exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care provider would render.

So where did Vance get his info?

 

[Postvieww]

Even many MSM liberal commentators conceded Vance won.

 

[eleos1954]

I'm giving it to Walz. It was pretty close. 60 - 40. I would have gone 55 - 45...no I will go with 55 - 45.

I doubt the VP date will have much effect ... I think most voters pretty much decided how they will vote before the debate. Neither of them hurt their respective party. I'd say it was a draw.