Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Walt Brown and the Hydroplate theory.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Job 33:6" data-source="post: 74917091" data-attributes="member: 399299"><p>"The way the canyon then takes a hard right turn after Marbel canyon up and over the Kaibab Plateau which is hard to explain if it was created by a slow carving river which could not flow uphill. "</p><p></p><p>Water may not flow uphill, but of course land can rise around water, making it appear as if water had flown up hill to get to the other side of a mound.</p><p></p><p>Imagine a stream starting at point A, flowing through point B and ending at point C. If point B topographically rises (but water elevation stays the same), water erodes through the land as it rises. And in the end you are left with water flowing from point A to C as it always has, but with a mound around point B, as if water had flown over a mound, but in reality never had.</p><p></p><p>This is known as tectonic uplift in the theory of plate tectonics. It is commonly observed in nature.</p><p></p><p>If the canyon is believed to have formed predominantly from a high energy global flood, this would contradict the hydroplate hypothesis. If you're simply commenting on ideas of small local floods, then i suppose that is fine. I wouldn't disagree with small ice dams resulting in rapid erosion on a local scale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Job 33:6, post: 74917091, member: 399299"] "The way the canyon then takes a hard right turn after Marbel canyon up and over the Kaibab Plateau which is hard to explain if it was created by a slow carving river which could not flow uphill. " Water may not flow uphill, but of course land can rise around water, making it appear as if water had flown up hill to get to the other side of a mound. Imagine a stream starting at point A, flowing through point B and ending at point C. If point B topographically rises (but water elevation stays the same), water erodes through the land as it rises. And in the end you are left with water flowing from point A to C as it always has, but with a mound around point B, as if water had flown over a mound, but in reality never had. This is known as tectonic uplift in the theory of plate tectonics. It is commonly observed in nature. If the canyon is believed to have formed predominantly from a high energy global flood, this would contradict the hydroplate hypothesis. If you're simply commenting on ideas of small local floods, then i suppose that is fine. I wouldn't disagree with small ice dams resulting in rapid erosion on a local scale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Walt Brown and the Hydroplate theory.
Top
Bottom