Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Viruses that prove common descent
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="xianghua" data-source="post: 71305118" data-attributes="member: 395317"><p>no. the problem here isnt about integration sites but about fixation event. if we need an erv to be fixed its need to be beneficial or at least neutral. so if the entire genome is already functional, there only about few places in the genome that we can actually add an erv to the genome.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="xianghua, post: 71305118, member: 395317"] no. the problem here isnt about integration sites but about fixation event. if we need an erv to be fixed its need to be beneficial or at least neutral. so if the entire genome is already functional, there only about few places in the genome that we can actually add an erv to the genome. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Viruses that prove common descent
Top
Bottom