- Feb 5, 2002
- 185,629
- 68,245
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Taylor Marshall just released on his YouTube channel a two part interviewwith Archbishop Viganò. In the videos, Marshall reads Viganò’s written responses to written questions that had been submitted to him.
Here I will only focus on one of the questions and Viganò’s response. Question #10 reads as follows:
“What do you think of the munus vs. ministerium argument that Benedict XVI did not truly resign?”
(Source: Dr. Taylor Marshall, Vigano interview, Part II)
I don’t intend to go into great detail on Viganò’s reasoning, which readers can read or hear for themselves at around the 25:00 mark in Marshall’s video. The key takeaway is that Archbishop Viganò replied, in part, saying (bold added):
“The resignation of Benedict XVI, due to the procedural defects and canonical monstrumthat it produced [of two apparent “popes”], is certainly invalid…”
Clearly, Viganò says that Benedict’s resignation was invalid. He goes on to say that “The fact that Ratzinger may have subjectively believed that he abdicated from the papacy does not affect the nullity of the Renunciation.”
Thus, following the logic, if Benedict remained pope till his death, it would obviously follow the conclave that elected Bergoglio, and his election was invalid as well. So, here it is clearly evident that Archbishop Viganò now firmly holds the Benepapist (or Benevacantist/Beneplenist) position.
Continued below.
romalocutaest.com
Here I will only focus on one of the questions and Viganò’s response. Question #10 reads as follows:
“What do you think of the munus vs. ministerium argument that Benedict XVI did not truly resign?”
(Source: Dr. Taylor Marshall, Vigano interview, Part II)
I don’t intend to go into great detail on Viganò’s reasoning, which readers can read or hear for themselves at around the 25:00 mark in Marshall’s video. The key takeaway is that Archbishop Viganò replied, in part, saying (bold added):
“The resignation of Benedict XVI, due to the procedural defects and canonical monstrumthat it produced [of two apparent “popes”], is certainly invalid…”
Clearly, Viganò says that Benedict’s resignation was invalid. He goes on to say that “The fact that Ratzinger may have subjectively believed that he abdicated from the papacy does not affect the nullity of the Renunciation.”
Thus, following the logic, if Benedict remained pope till his death, it would obviously follow the conclave that elected Bergoglio, and his election was invalid as well. So, here it is clearly evident that Archbishop Viganò now firmly holds the Benepapist (or Benevacantist/Beneplenist) position.
Continued below.
Viganò hops from one bad theory to another
August 9, 2024 (Steven O’Reilly) – Taylor Marshall just released on his YouTube channel a two part interview with Archbishop Viganò. In the videos, Marshall reads Viganò’s written…
romalocutaest.com
