Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Conspiracy Theories
Vaccines
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ygrene Imref" data-source="post: 71032820" data-attributes="member: 395531"><p>You mean [internal] imperialism.</p><p></p><p>It's been done, and because it's been done, African countries won't just roll over and let those previous bedfellows do the same okie done as was done so easily in the last.</p><p></p><p>Besides, as said, China has a good portion of resource mining latitude; the West can't break into African countries unless they "accidently" expose them to something, and then move in and take over in the name of "humanitarian aid." But, the Africans have been hip to this scheme for a while. That is why during the Ebola crisis the UN was treated like a monster - with people RUNNING from them, and their "aid."</p><p></p><p>The "aid" spiel means "imminent geographical and resource domain." The land on which Africans live is full of resources, and they know this.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps they dont have the same drive to rape the land of its resources for the sake of a dollar, or the facade of "progress." I am sure, though, "we" in the West will relieve them of the decision on what to do with their land. It is just that when that does happen it will likely be during war, or part of the start of one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ygrene Imref, post: 71032820, member: 395531"] You mean [internal] imperialism. It's been done, and because it's been done, African countries won't just roll over and let those previous bedfellows do the same okie done as was done so easily in the last. Besides, as said, China has a good portion of resource mining latitude; the West can't break into African countries unless they "accidently" expose them to something, and then move in and take over in the name of "humanitarian aid." But, the Africans have been hip to this scheme for a while. That is why during the Ebola crisis the UN was treated like a monster - with people RUNNING from them, and their "aid." The "aid" spiel means "imminent geographical and resource domain." The land on which Africans live is full of resources, and they know this. Perhaps they dont have the same drive to rape the land of its resources for the sake of a dollar, or the facade of "progress." I am sure, though, "we" in the West will relieve them of the decision on what to do with their land. It is just that when that does happen it will likely be during war, or part of the start of one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Hobbies, Interests & Entertainment
Conspiracy Theories
Vaccines
Top
Bottom