Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
US Senate Votes to Protect Same Sex Marriage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="grasping the after wind" data-source="post: 77071748" data-attributes="member: 256417"><p>Nothing you posted actually poses a true contradiction of what I posted. The Supreme Court has no restraint from ruling anyway it chooses. So, if the controlling faction in the Supreme Court decided that its goal was to do away with same sex marriage, it could rule that such marriages were unconstitutional just as easily as it ruled that denying same sex marriages was unconstitutional. I do not see that there is any desire on the part of the controlling faction of the SC to change the current status quo on same sex marriage. Nor do I believe anyone in Congress is actually concerned that same sex marriage would be in danger from a Supreme Court ruling. Therefore, I reiterate my conclusion that this is all just political posturing and nothing more. The only outcome that I can see that might come from the passage of this law is political posturing lawsuits by some states challenging it that will cost the taxpayers of the states and the country unnecessarily. The supreme court ruled on this issue a while back and using a throwaway remark by one Justice to waste legislative time and money on a completely unnecessary bill is I guess what the voters deserve for electing a group of less than useful idiots to positions of power.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="grasping the after wind, post: 77071748, member: 256417"] Nothing you posted actually poses a true contradiction of what I posted. The Supreme Court has no restraint from ruling anyway it chooses. So, if the controlling faction in the Supreme Court decided that its goal was to do away with same sex marriage, it could rule that such marriages were unconstitutional just as easily as it ruled that denying same sex marriages was unconstitutional. I do not see that there is any desire on the part of the controlling faction of the SC to change the current status quo on same sex marriage. Nor do I believe anyone in Congress is actually concerned that same sex marriage would be in danger from a Supreme Court ruling. Therefore, I reiterate my conclusion that this is all just political posturing and nothing more. The only outcome that I can see that might come from the passage of this law is political posturing lawsuits by some states challenging it that will cost the taxpayers of the states and the country unnecessarily. The supreme court ruled on this issue a while back and using a throwaway remark by one Justice to waste legislative time and money on a completely unnecessary bill is I guess what the voters deserve for electing a group of less than useful idiots to positions of power. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
US Senate Votes to Protect Same Sex Marriage
Top
Bottom