Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
US agencies call for pause in Johnson & Johnson vaccine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sesquiterpene" data-source="post: 75885587" data-attributes="member: 413101"><p>Yes, I don't know what the actual risk is(edit: and which risk one is talking about - the BBC mentioned fatal blood clots, the infographic "blood clots", and I think the FDA was only mentioning cases, with one fatality) - it's low enough that it's hard to get good statistics, and it will probably take months to firm up the numbers. The infographic I posted seems to imply a risk higher than one in a million. I was actually thinking that the J & J numbers will probably trend towards higher risk, similar to the what the infographic showed for the Az.</p><p></p><p>And the BBC article only stated that it "has been estimated" without attribution. I'm sure that a wide range of estimates are available.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sesquiterpene, post: 75885587, member: 413101"] Yes, I don't know what the actual risk is(edit: and which risk one is talking about - the BBC mentioned fatal blood clots, the infographic "blood clots", and I think the FDA was only mentioning cases, with one fatality) - it's low enough that it's hard to get good statistics, and it will probably take months to firm up the numbers. The infographic I posted seems to imply a risk higher than one in a million. I was actually thinking that the J & J numbers will probably trend towards higher risk, similar to the what the infographic showed for the Az. And the BBC article only stated that it "has been estimated" without attribution. I'm sure that a wide range of estimates are available. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
US agencies call for pause in Johnson & Johnson vaccine
Top
Bottom