Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
e=MC^2 is one of the biggest useless hoaxes around.
Now is that so? Well, I guess the British Government are just wasting their money building a new generation of nuclear power stations, aren't they?
Lots of Christians are evolutionists.Forget about that. Evolutionists have bigger problems......like explaining origin (they try to evade this).
Every evolutionist must answer where we came from. Eventually you get down to everything coming from nothing. They even have mathematics equations about everything coming from nothing. The pseudo scientists behind this are lunatics.
When mathematics disconnect from reality/observation science, it is lunacy. e=MC^2 is one of the biggest useless hoaxes around.
Lots of Christians are evolutionists.
And they say it all came from god.
So there.
Be careful about disputing the Christianity of Christians here. They banish people for that. I wont tell though.The term christian today has become meaningless. Even People who believe in aliens are called christians too by the Telievision and most people believe the Telievision.
I'd say those that believe in the King James bible (or any of the old bibles based on textus receptus) cannot be evolutionists.
The Christians here who believe in evolution, do you think they are Christians? It sounds like you dont from your previous post. Sorry if I'm mistaken.What? I merely defined the modern day definition of christianity. I didn't refer to any person or christian.
What are some topics for which you have found scientific explanations to be unsatisfactory? What is it about the scientific explanations that you've been given that leaves you wanting a better explanation? Are you still in search of more science to back up these explanations or have you given up and left your curiosity unsatisfied on these topics?
As that first wiki link says (first line): "Astrobiology is the study of the origin, evolution, distribution, and future of life in the universe: extraterrestrial life and life on Earth."
Notice how they separate 'origin' from 'evolution' in that definition. As for the existence of the web sites - that's the internet for you... If you mean how do I explain the existence of Astrobiology, the wiki quote describes what it's about, and the reason people want to study that stuff is curiosity.
I guess you never bothered to read about Galen Winsor or cluesforum research on the nuclear hoax. Even the old WW2 footage from Japan where the Japanese military generals state that the atom/nuke was a hoax and it was all propaganda.
e=MC^2 is the biggest hoax. Einstein is just a actor they put on a pedestal so the public masses can worship. Just like stephen hawking, another actor.
To describe abiogenesis as a sub topic of Evolution is like describing the physics of sound as a subtopic of musicology.
At the risk of repeating myself, there is a difference between believing that something happened, and believing that that something has been sufficiently accounted for.
Not really any difference at all.
I guess you never bothered to read about Galen Winsor or cluesforum research on the nuclear hoax. Even the old WW2 footage from Japan where the Japanese military generals state that the atom/nuke was a hoax and it was all propaganda.
e=MC^2 is the biggest hoax. Einstein is just a actor they put on a pedestal so the public masses can worship. Just like stephen hawking, another actor.
I'd say those that believe in the King James bible (or any of the old bibles based on textus receptus) cannot be evolutionists.
it amazes me how evolutionists applies "evolve" to all sorts of phenomena, computers, airplanes, cars.
never mind these processes involved intelligent intervention.
but yet when it comes to molecules evolving into life, they are loathe to mention the word evolve.
maybe the second part of your quote explains why that is.
Forget about that. Evolutionists have bigger problems......like explaining origin (they try to evade this).
Every evolutionist must answer where we came from. Eventually you get down to everything coming from nothing. They even have mathematics equations about everything coming from nothing. The pseudo scientists behind this are lunatics.
When mathematics disconnect from reality/observation science, it is lunacy. e=MC^2 is one of the biggest useless hoaxes around.
There is no requirement for evolution by natural selection to involve sentience. All organisms, sentient or otherwise, can evolve by natural selection. All it takes is heritable variability and selection pressure (survivability). So we have contemporary evidence of new strains of cold and flu viruses evolving year by year and of bacteria evolving resistance to antibiotics. The evolution of new species of plants has been observed also.But, they are not sentient
They are not, like fish, the animals, the birds
How do they 'evolve' (can they evolve) and what, might they evolve to become ~as single cell species
The word 'evolve' has slightly different meanings in different contexts - in a general context it just means 'to develop gradually' (in chemistry it means 'to give off', e.g. gas, heat). In the biological sciences it is used as a shorthand for the genetic changes in living populations - as explained by Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection (TOE).it amazes me how evolutionists applies "evolve" to all sorts of phenomena, computers, airplanes, cars.
never mind these processes involved intelligent intervention.
but yet when it comes to molecules evolving into life, they are loathe to mention the word evolve.
maybe the second part of your quote explains why that is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?