Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There was an emergency room medicine doctor that was talking about how the cells remain vital until you reintroduce oxygen. That was when the cell died. I have some photos of the cells on my computer somewhere but I am not sure where they are now.As for oxygen - that's an interesting observation - have you given it further thought?
There was an emergency room medicine doctor that was talking about how the cells remain vital until you reintroduce oxygen. That was when the cell died. I have some photos of the cells on my computer somewhere but I am not sure where they are now.
Dittrich's article about Alexander has been shown to be fraudulent.
Dittrich's article about Alexander has been shown to be fraudulent.
http://iands.org/news/news/front-pa...cle-on-eben-alexander-distorts-the-facts.html
Here is another.I am aware of this article.
I find it a questionable source though, coming from a site which is promoting a video that has Alexander in it.
each core works on one stream. Almost all cpus have multiple cores now. All GPUs have multiple cores.Now let's watch the double-talk begin whois. Notice he agrees that computers suspend programs to work on the next.
Yet the only explanation they tried to give is that they work on multiple streams at the same time - contradicting thier own claims. LOL.
so now you are going to give up on talking about processing and talk about transmission instead?I realize you all do not remember what you post from one to the next, but so far only whois and myself have remained consistent from one post to the next. Separate cpu's can work on more than one set of data at a time - but regardless if you have a billion cpu's - it is still limited because of bus widths. The human mind is not so constrained - but has billions of processors and billions of neural pathways. Each processor in the human brain has multiple data pathways - not limited data pathways shared by multiple processors.
AS DO ALL BRAINSBut you are all still avoiding what began all of this. ALL COMPUTERS RUN ON 2 BIT BINARY CODE.
Nothing in our brain gets processed on the order of nanoseconds.signalsome down axons would only make it a fraction of a micrometer in that time. Even looking at a synapse, you are looking at .5msec just for the neurotransmitter to cross the cleft.Sort of like the nanoseconds it takes us to process all the stimuli reaching our brains compared to the tiny bit a computer processes in those same nanoseconds? For example collision technology. I say if we could concentrate and process only one thing as it does ignoring all other input - we could react just as quickly as it does to those changing distances.
I agree - not even close. Maybe in 1000 years there might be a comparison between technology and the brain.
In the sense that a neuron either fires or doesn't fire, it is binary. There are certainly analog components as well, but then again, computers can integrate analog components as well.To get back to the subject: The brain is not a binary processor, nor is the transmission of nerve impulses electrical, but rather chemical at the synapse. The chemical neurotransmitters are of numerous kinds, and there may be feedback from the receptor neuron that inhibits or enhances the emission of the neurotransmitters.
See:
"Neurotransmitter (From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
Neurotransmitters are endogenous chemicals that enable neurotransmission. They transmit signals across a chemical synapse, such as in a neuromuscular junction, from one neuron (nerve cell) to another "target" neuron, muscle cell, or gland cell. Neurotransmitters are released from synaptic vesicles in synapses into the synaptic cleft, where they are received by receptors on other synapses. Many neurotransmitters are synthesized from simple and plentiful precursors such as amino acids, which are readily available from the diet and only require a small number of biosynthetic steps to convert them. Neurotransmitters play a major role in shaping everyday life and functions. Their exact numbers are unknown but more than 100 chemical messengers have been identified." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuro...nsmitters.2C_peptides.2C_and_gasotransmitters
So the brain is definitely not a binary processor.
…
The objective would be to find a way to clear the enzymes out of the cell before you reintroduce the oxygen. Or perhaps you could give the medics a medicine that would shut down the production of the enzymes to make it easier to resuscitate when the patient gets to the hospital. As you can read in Wiki, "permanent brain cell damage occurs when fresh blood infuses the cell". Up until the point they attempt to resuscitation, the cell is just fine. It would help if I could find where I put those photos.If cells die after reintroduction to oxygen, that would mean the cells already reached the point of no return, since cells require oxygen to survive.
I just asked my son about this. A band has a band director or conductors because of the amount of time it takes for the ears to hear the music is slower then they can see the conductor. Of course we all know that light travels faster then sound. So for the music to be synchronized then people must see the conductor and then respond at about the same rate. Not faster or slower then the other players.That the brain operates on a timescale of milliseconds is a fact floating around in the ether for anybody with even a passing interest in science. But it seems to be one which escaped the notice of Justatruthseeker.
I just asked my son about this. A band has a band director or conductors because of the amount of time it takes for the ears to hear the music is slower then they can see the conductor. Of course we all know that light travels faster then sound. So for the music to be synchronized then people must see the conductor and then respond at about the same rate. Not faster or slower then the other players.
Not just that but if we say that a single celled organism A was produced on earth then it should have been produced in many places in the universe. If we accept that life evolved then that same mechanism is at work all over the universe. The organism A you speak of was formed in an alien environment. If it could have formed in that alien environment on earth then it can do so in other places in the universe. In fact it should be everywhere that there is some sort of liquid or was some sort of liquid in the past. Bacteria can survive in hostile environments so this would imply that some sort of life can survive anywhere and everywhere there is liquid of any sort. But so far we have found zilch even on mars which you would think would have some being closest to earth.If somebody on an alien planet was having the evolution of life on Earth explained to him for the first time, he might imagine that there was a single cell organism A. Then the environment changed, and natural selection produced single cell organism B, which in turn evolved into single cell organism C, and so on.
What he would have no reason at all to postulate is the emergence of fabulously complex organisms such as us, because it is by no means clear that natural selection implies that.
well see, that's the thing.That the brain operates on a timescale of milliseconds is a fact floating around in the ether for anybody with even a passing interest in science. But it seems to be one which escaped the notice of Justatruthseeker.
Let's assume a 10 meter stage. The speed of sound is 340 m/s. That means it takes 29 milliseconds for the sound to get from one side of the stage to the other. Unsurprisingly, we can detect a delay of 29 milliseconds. Light travels that distance in 33 nanoseconds. We cannot detect a delay of 33 nanoseconds.I just asked my son about this. A band has a band director or conductors because of the amount of time it takes for the ears to hear the music is slower then they can see the conductor. Of course we all know that light travels faster then sound. So for the music to be synchronized then people must see the conductor and then respond at about the same rate. Not faster or slower than the other players.
I can compensate for that delay. When we sing in church I can sing ahead of behind or with the rest of the people. So I do not exactly see the need for a director.Let's assume a 10 meter stage. The speed of sound is 340 m/s. That means it takes 29 milliseconds for the sound to get from one side of the stage to the other. Unsurprisingly, we can detect a delay of 29 milliseconds. Light travels that distance in 33 nanoseconds. We cannot detect a delay of 33 nanoseconds.
The brain works on the scale of milliseconds, not nanoseconds as demonstrated by your example.
charge of God and God is the entire universe.
AC or DC?Ah, so we have gone from "God is energy" to "God is an electrical charge".
Positive or negative?
The problem with this particular layman is that he "knows" more about astrophysics than all the astrophysicists on the planet put together, and now he "knows" everything there is to know about both computer science and neurology.
Ah, so we have gone from "God is energy" to "God is an electrical charge".
Positive or negative?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?