• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Unitary Executive

IzzyPop

I wear my sunglasses at night...
Jun 2, 2007
5,379
438
52
✟37,709.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
A different thread got me thinking of this and I am interested on other peoples thoughts on this matter.

The idea unitary executive basically states that in pursuing national security, the President is the law. That he can suspend and/or ignore various legal niceties because the need for national security supercedes all else.

Nixon was a big proponent of this idea and many of the Bush White House were with Nixon as well, so this idea is popping back up. Signing statements, wire-taps, suspending habeus corpus, insane amounts of secrecy, the valuing of loyalty over competence, etc.

Anyone ever read It Can't Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis? It is a story about how the US turns from a republic to a fascist state, and many of the steps that took place in that book (written in the '40s) have been taking place over the pace 7 years.

We are by no means a fascist state. But we have started down that path and the whole concept of a unitary executive is the antithesis of our form of government.
 

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,428
7,165
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟425,831.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It's a terrible idea. It violates the very framework for our government, which is separation of powers. And it won't happen (at least on a large scale) if Congress and the courts do their jobs. AFAIK, wire-tapping and other forms of internal surveillance still require a warrant. I know that under the War Powers Act, the President, by himself, can respond militarily to an emergency threat. But he has to report to Congress and obtain authorization for any action lasting more than 60 days. Even in a national emergency--and even if involving other branches of government makes his job more cumbersome and less efficient--the President cannot have unchecked power. The alternative is just worse.
 
Upvote 0

Voegelin

Reactionary
Aug 18, 2003
20,145
1,430
Connecticut
✟26,726.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
The idea unitary executive basically states that in pursuing national security, the President is the law.
Nixon was a big proponent of this idea and many of the Bush White House were with Nixon as well, so this idea is popping back up.

It is? I wasn't aware of that. Didn't know Nixon embraced the idea either. Got any policy papers, speeches (not out of content quotes lifted from this or that venue) or other material from Nixon advocating this?

You say the idea is "popping back up" because "many" who worked with Nixon are in the Bush White House.

Name them and give us some links to speeches in which they say "the President is the law" (or should be).

Anyone ever read It Can't Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis? It is a story about how the US turns from a republic to a fascist state

Sinclair Lewis was a propagandist who worked with the Comintern's Willi Münzenberg. Hardly the person to lecture anyone on the possibility of a totalitarian take-over of America. He supported a regime which wanted to do exactly that (albeit under the banner of communism, not facism).

We are by no means a fascist state. But we have started down that path and the whole concept of a unitary executive is the antithesis of our form of government.

This is rhetoric right out of the 1930s. Back when Samuel Dickstein (D-NY) held hearings in Congress about a plot to stage an armed putsch against the New Deal. The New York Democrat alledged "fascists" had stock-piled weapons on Capitol Hill to depose FDR.

We learned in the 1990s from the release of US and Soviet classified documents that 11 term congressman Dickstein, while receiving his congressional salary, was also receiving $1,250 a month from the NKVD (this at a time when the average America had a good job if he made $100 a month). In other words, the allegations you make not only have a history but also, when made in the past, were motivated by politics, not reality.

Want to see a threat of so-called "unitary" government? Don't look to the Executive. Look to the Judiciary. That is the branch which has, over the last 80 years, usurped the powers of the other two branches of government.

Btw...I can give you a quote from one person working in the executive branch who suggested the President is the law:

"Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool."
--Clinton presidential aide Paul Begala, July 1998
 
Upvote 0

IzzyPop

I wear my sunglasses at night...
Jun 2, 2007
5,379
438
52
✟37,709.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
It is? I wasn't aware of that. Didn't know Nixon embraced the idea either. Got any policy papers, speeches (not out of content quotes lifted from this or that venue) or other material from Nixon advocating this?

You say the idea is "popping back up" because "many" who worked with Nixon are in the Bush White House.

Name them and give us some links to speeches in which they say "the President is the law" (or should be).



Sinclair Lewis was a propagandist who worked with the Comintern's Willi Münzenberg. Hardly the person to lecture anyone on the possibility of a totalitarian take-over of America. He supported a regime which wanted to do exactly that (albeit under the banner of communism, not facism).



This is rhetoric right out of the 1930s. Back when Samuel Dickstein (D-NY) held hearings in Congress about a plot to stage an armed putsch against the New Deal. The New York Democrat alledged "fascists" had stock-piled weapons on Capitol Hill to depose FDR.

We learned in the 1990s from the release of US and Soviet classified documents that 11 term congressman Dickstein, while receiving his congressional salary, was also receiving $1,250 a month from the NKVD (this at a time when the average America had a good job if he made $100 a month). In other words, the allegations you make not only have a history but also, when made in the past, were motivated by politics, not reality.

Want to see a threat of so-called "unitary" government? Don't look to the Executive. Look to the Judiciary. That is the branch which has, over the last 80 years, usurped the powers of the other two branches of government.

Btw...I can give you a quote from one person working in the executive branch who suggested the President is the law:

"Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool."
--Clinton presidential aide Paul Begala, July 1998

Emphasis mine.


Judge Alito's support of the theory


Cheny was an aide under Nixon

Feilding was in the Nixon White House. Please note that this article was written by a Nixon aide.

This is only 5 minutes of searching. And few of the links, even from righties, are complementary of this policy. There is much more if you would like to see for yourself.
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,197
3,195
Oregon
✟987,225.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
What can you do when millions encourage this kind of behaviour? Offer free civics classes? Bush has said he can ignore any law he chooses-and people cheer.
Sadly, Bush does have a lot of enablers.

.
 
Upvote 0