A different thread got me thinking of this and I am interested on other peoples thoughts on this matter.
The idea unitary executive basically states that in pursuing national security, the President is the law. That he can suspend and/or ignore various legal niceties because the need for national security supercedes all else.
Nixon was a big proponent of this idea and many of the Bush White House were with Nixon as well, so this idea is popping back up. Signing statements, wire-taps, suspending habeus corpus, insane amounts of secrecy, the valuing of loyalty over competence, etc.
Anyone ever read It Can't Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis? It is a story about how the US turns from a republic to a fascist state, and many of the steps that took place in that book (written in the '40s) have been taking place over the pace 7 years.
We are by no means a fascist state. But we have started down that path and the whole concept of a unitary executive is the antithesis of our form of government.
The idea unitary executive basically states that in pursuing national security, the President is the law. That he can suspend and/or ignore various legal niceties because the need for national security supercedes all else.
Nixon was a big proponent of this idea and many of the Bush White House were with Nixon as well, so this idea is popping back up. Signing statements, wire-taps, suspending habeus corpus, insane amounts of secrecy, the valuing of loyalty over competence, etc.
Anyone ever read It Can't Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis? It is a story about how the US turns from a republic to a fascist state, and many of the steps that took place in that book (written in the '40s) have been taking place over the pace 7 years.
We are by no means a fascist state. But we have started down that path and the whole concept of a unitary executive is the antithesis of our form of government.