• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Underwear Bomber" Victim Statement by Kurt Haskell Says Plot Was a False Flag Attack

M

ManFromUncle

Guest
Source: published at Haskell's personal website and at Lew Rockwell. Passenger Kurt Haskell on Flight 253 the "Underwear Bomber" flight says it was a false flag attack assisted by the government, in federal court in his victim impact statement. How fast did that get buried by the media? Whether he is right or wrong, would it merit one tiny newspaper clip? But there is NOTHING. That tells you something right there.

Anyone with a brain would have rolled their eyes when they now had an "underwear bomber," which directly led to the privates-groping policy which is a power trip over the sheep. Who rolled over and accepted that too. The importance of that policy is easy to understand: in the "war on terror," if we can do this to you and your kids, we can do anything. It is a very well thought-out insistence on total submission.


From statement:

In closing I will just say that regardless of how the media and government try to shape the public perception of this case, I am convinced that Umar was given an intentionally defective bomb by a U.S. Government agent and placed on our flight without showing a passport or going through security, to stage a false terrorist attack to be used to implement various government policies.
Entire statement posted at Lew Rockwell: Victim Impact Statement by Kurt Haskell :

I wish to thank the Court for allowing me these 5 minutes to make my statement. My references to the government in this statement refer to the Federal Government excluding this Court and the prosecution.

On Christmas Day 2009, my wife and I were returning from an African safari and had a connecting flight through Amsterdam. As we waited for our flight, we sat on the floor next to the boarding gate. What I witnessed while sitting there and subsequent events have changed my life forever. While I sat there, I witnessed Umar dressed in jeans and a white t-shirt, being escorted around security by a man in a tan suit who spoke perfect American English and who aided Umar in boarding without a passport. The airline gate worker initially refused Umar boarding until the man in the tan suit intervened. The event meant nothing to me at the time. Little did I know that Umar would try to kill me a few hours later as our flight approached Detroit. The final 10 minutes of our flight after the attack were the worst minutes of my life. During those 10 minutes I sat paralyzed in fear. Unfortunately, what happened next has had an even greater impact on my life and has saddened me further.

When we landed, I was shocked that our plane taxied up to the gate. I was further shocked that we were forced to sit on the plane for 20 minutes with powder from the so called bomb all over the cabin. The officers that boarded the plane did nothing to ensure our safety and did not check for accomplices or other explosive devices. Several passengers trampled through parts of the bomb as they exited the plane. We were then taken into the terminal with our unchecked carry on bags. Again, there was no concern for our safety even though Umar told the officers that there was another bomb on board as he exited the plane. I wondered why nobody was concerned about our safety, accomplices or other bombs and the lack of concern worried me greatly. I immediately told the FBI my story in order to help catch the accomplice I had seen in Amsterdam. It soon became obvious that the FBI wasn't interested in what I had to say, which upset me further. For one month the government refused to admit the existence of the man in the tan suit before changing course and admitting his existence in an ABC News article on January 22, 2010. That was the last time the government talked about this man. The video that would prove the truth of my account has never been released. I continue to be emotional upset that the video has not been released. The Dutch police, meanwhile, in this article (show article), also confirmed that Umar did not show his passport in Amsterdam which also meant that he didn't go through security as both are in the same line in Amsterdam. It upsets me that the government refuses to admit this fact.

I became further saddened from this case, when Patrick Kennedy of the State Department during Congressional hearings, admitted that Umar was a known terrorist, was being followed, and the U.S. allowed him into the U.S. so that it could catch Umar's accomplices. I was once again shocked and saddened when Michael Leiter of the National Counter terrorism Center admitted during these same hearings that intentionally letting terrorists into the U.S. was a frequent practice of the U.S. Government. I cannot fully explain my sadness, disappointment and fear when I realized that my government allowed an attack on me intentionally.

During this time, I questioned if my country intentionally put a known terrorist onto my flight with a live bomb. I had many sleepless nights over this issue. My answer came shortly thereafter. In late 2010, the FBI admitted to giving out intentionally defective bombs to the Portland Christmas Tree Bomber,the Wrigley Field Bomber and several others. Further, Mr. Chambers was quoted in the Free Press on January 11, 2011 when he indicated that the government's own explosives experts had indicated that Umar's bomb was impossibly defective. I wondered how that could be. Certainly, I thought, Al Qaeda wouldn't go through all of the trouble to plan such an attack only to provide the terrorist with an impossibly defective bomb.

I attended nearly all of the pretrial hearings. At the hearing on January 28, 2011, I was greatly disappointed by the prosecution's request to block evidence from Mr. Chambers "as it could then be able to be obtained by third parties, who could use it in a civil suit against the government". It really bothered me that the government apparently was admitting to wrongdoing of some kind as it admitted that it was concerned it would be sued. It further upset me to know that the government was putting its own interests ahead of those of the passengers.

When I attended the jury selection hearings, I questioned why versions of the same two questions kept coming up, those being:

1. Do you think whether you'll be able to tell whether something is actually a bomb? and
2. Do you realize that sometimes the media doesn't always tell the truth?

I continued to be greatly saddened at this point as I felt the truth continued to be hidden.

When Umar listed me as his only witness, I was happy to testify, not on his behalf, but on behalf of the truth. I never expected to testify, as my eyewitness account would have been too damaging to the myth that the government and media are putting forward. A mere 5 days after I was announced as a witness, there was an inexplicable guilty plea which exasperated me as I no longer would be testifying.

In closing I will just say that regardless of how the media and government try to shape the public perception of this case, I am convinced that Umar was given an intentionally defective bomb by a U.S. Government agent and placed on our flight without showing a passport or going through security, to stage a false terrorist attack to be used to implement various government policies.

The effect this matter has had on my life has been astounding and due to this case, I will never trust the government in any matter, ever.

In regards to sentencing, nothing I've said excuses the fact that Umar tried to kill me. He has waived his valid claim to the entrapment defense. Umar, you are not a great Muslim martyr, you are merely a "Patsy". I ask the court to impose the mandatory sentence.
posted at Haskell family blog: Adventures with Kurt and Lori: Victim Impact Statement

Excellent video by Dick McManus, candidate for US Congress, 2nd Congressional District, WA (incumbent Rep. Rick Larsen, D-WA)

[youtube]TNXqkZO3Y1g[/youtube]

On 9/11:

High-Ranking American Military Officers Question 9/11
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

911 Case Closed: Aerial Photo Shows Towers Were Exploded Outward, Did Not "Collapse"
http://www.christianforums.com/t7568052/

Former Director at US Army War College Says MOSSAD Behind 9/11 and USS Liberty
http://www.christianforums.com/t7597588/
 

Blayz

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2007
3,367
231
60
Singapore
✟4,827.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Should this Victim Impact Statement have made the news or not?

What was he a victim of, exactly? Being made to wait on a plane? Hey, that's happened to me. Can I have my impact statement read please.

Still no middlemen named.

Oh, and can I say, hilarious that you listed threads here on CF as "evidence" I should find another thread where I have posted that these conspiracies are pure tinfoil hattery and link to that as evidence. Is that how it works?
 
Upvote 0

sword_of_truth

Regular Member
Feb 28, 2010
311
9
Visit site
✟22,999.00
Faith
Christian
And so a statement produced in court by an eyewitness doesn't count as evidence?!

What was he a victim of, exactly? Being made to wait on a plane? Hey, that's happened to me. Can I have my impact statement read please.

Still no middlemen named.

Oh, and can I say, hilarious that you listed threads here on CF as "evidence" I should find another thread where I have posted that these conspiracies are pure tinfoil hattery and link to that as evidence. Is that how it works?
 
Upvote 0

Blayz

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2007
3,367
231
60
Singapore
✟4,827.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
And so a statement produced in court by an eyewitness doesn't count as evidence?!

"Every victim of a crime in Michigan is entitled to make a statement in open court regarding the impact of the crime on their life."

Not

"Every victim of a crime in Michigan is entitled to make a statement in open court regarding event they remember leading up to the crime that they think is significant, and by the way here's what I think happened, and the criminal system MUST follow up on my theory"

Still no middlemen named.
 
Upvote 0
M

ManFromUncle

Guest
"Every victim of a crime in Michigan is entitled to make a statement in open court regarding the impact of the crime on their life."

Not

"Every victim of a crime in Michigan is entitled to make a statement in open court regarding event they remember leading up to the crime that they think is significant, and by the way here's what I think happened, and the criminal system MUST follow up on my theory"

Still no middlemen named.

By middlemen do you men the agents who help Umar get through, and took him through the door into a secure area? How would Haskell know their names? That's the job of an investigation.
 
Upvote 0

Bethesda

Newbie
Sep 11, 2012
831
18
✟23,601.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
So just like every other terrorist attack in history this one is also a "false-flag" operation by the US and/or Israeli government? Amazing that no one has caught on yet.

Yes - those guys in Al-Q are so lazy - just sitting around watching TV all day whilst the poor folk in the CIA/MI5 and Mossad do all the hard work. I do love the idea of 9/11 being a conspiracy to give Al-Q etc a bad name - thats like saying the Holocaust was a conspiracy to give Nazism, fascism, racism and anti-semitism a bad name whereas up then they had been so well though of.
 
Upvote 0

Bethesda

Newbie
Sep 11, 2012
831
18
✟23,601.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Anyone with a brain would have rolled their eyes when they now had an "underwear bomber," which directly led to the privates-groping policy which is a power trip over the sheep. http://www.christianforums.com/t7597588/

I always find that referring to other human beings as sheep (because they are not as enlightened as the speaker) is rather arrogant. Those people who say 'sheeple wake up' should be exiled to a distant Scottish island where they can see plenty of sheep and few people.
 
Upvote 0
M

ManFromUncle

Guest
Yes - those guys in Al-Q are so lazy - just sitting around watching TV all day whilst the poor folk in the CIA/MI5 and Mossad do all the hard work. I do love the idea of 9/11 being a conspiracy to give Al-Q etc a bad name - thats like saying the Holocaust was a conspiracy to give Nazism, fascism, racism and anti-semitism a bad name whereas up then they had been so well though of.

Why wasn't Haskell's statement investigated? Why didn't the media report this?
 
Upvote 0
M

ManFromUncle

Guest
Why is he considered a victim if the plot was stopped and nothing happened?

Because even trying to kill someone is still a crime, even if you don't succeed. If someone tries to kill you, you are still the victim. Otherwise people could be taking shots at each other but it's okay as long as you miss.
 
Upvote 0