Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Ukrainian Indictment Claims $7.4 Billion Obama-Linked Laundering, Puts Biden Group Take At $16.5 Mil
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RocksInMyHead" data-source="post: 74482456" data-attributes="member: 284142"><p>Anything is possible. As I said, it was definitely poor judgment.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, Donald Trump <em>says </em>that he never asked them to do that. One of his points of evidence being that they never announced any investigations. Except now they have.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not the <em>quid pro quo</em> that's the issue. It's what the <em>pro quo</em> was and how it benefited Trump personally. In other words, he used personal access to the President and aid money already approved by Congress to coerce another country into investigating a political rival. I still haven't seen any evidence that Shokin's firing benefited Biden in any way. He wasn't investigating Burisma - and his successor did (as well as investigating Hunter Biden specifically).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RocksInMyHead, post: 74482456, member: 284142"] Anything is possible. As I said, it was definitely poor judgment. Well, Donald Trump [I]says [/I]that he never asked them to do that. One of his points of evidence being that they never announced any investigations. Except now they have. It's not the [I]quid pro quo[/I] that's the issue. It's what the [I]pro quo[/I] was and how it benefited Trump personally. In other words, he used personal access to the President and aid money already approved by Congress to coerce another country into investigating a political rival. I still haven't seen any evidence that Shokin's firing benefited Biden in any way. He wasn't investigating Burisma - and his successor did (as well as investigating Hunter Biden specifically). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Ukrainian Indictment Claims $7.4 Billion Obama-Linked Laundering, Puts Biden Group Take At $16.5 Mil
Top
Bottom