• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Typology

Status
Not open for further replies.

LamorakDesGalis

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2004
2,198
235
Dallas Texas
✟26,098.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Some types are explicitly specified in Scripture. Those who use a "literal" hermeneutic (or historical grammatical interpretation) do acknowledge these types. But the major question concerns types which are not explicitly specified. One might make a case for a few implicit types, but I wouldn't say there are a lot. Those who do see a lot of types run the risk of overriding the "literal" meaning and imposing their own theology on the text.


LDG
 
Upvote 0

Jerrysch

Senior Veteran
Apr 13, 2005
3,714
23
✟4,104.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Some types are explicitly specified in Scripture. Those who use a "literal" hermeneutic (or historical grammatical interpretation) do acknowledge these types. But the major question concerns types which are not explicitly specified. One might make a case for a few implicit types, but I wouldn't say there are a lot. Those who do see a lot of types run the risk of overriding the "literal" meaning and imposing their own theology on the text.


LDG

Thanks for your input :wave:
 
Upvote 0
B

Ben12

Guest
The Bible is full of mysteries (mystery in the Greek language means a sacred secret); its pages are full of parables types and patterns not even including the culture and language barriers. The Bible is the blue print of truth; the Holy Spirit within us is the engineer or architect who is the only source of interpreting it.

The first miracle Jesus performed was he turned the water into wine; and proclaimed the new wine (revelation) is better then the old (tradition). This shows us it is a progressive book and we need be open to the Holy Spirit as it reveals its secrets. We need to grow up spiritual where we can hear the Spirit of truth with in and not man and his systems without. We should not ignore the revelation of the Bible just because most theologians in the past or present could not search it out or get pass their bias. Today there is a god out there that men worship call religion, church, orthodoxy and tradition that has taken the place of seeking truth. Just like the Jews; christians find themselves controlled by their religious past with all of its rituals, dogmas and traditions and they are totally blind too the reality of the Bible. We put out trust in one of the 22,000 denominations; without instead of the Holy Spirit of truth within. This is why we miss God; because we would rather hear men.

We say we look at truth as Christians; but in reality we are looking at it so often though someone else’s understanding and ignoring what the Bible truly has to say.

God is not a brain; He is a spirit. His Word is literal if all you desire is milk; but the deepness of God is far more then the letter that killeth.
 
Upvote 0

Jerrysch

Senior Veteran
Apr 13, 2005
3,714
23
✟4,104.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Bible is full of mysteries (mystery in the Greek language means a sacred secret); its pages are full of parables types and patterns not even including the culture and language barriers. The Bible is the blue print of truth; the Holy Spirit within us is the engineer or architect who is the only source of interpreting it.

The first miracle Jesus performed was he turned the water into wine; and proclaimed the new wine (revelation) is better then the old (tradition). This shows us it is a progressive book and we need be open to the Holy Spirit as it reveals its secrets. We need to grow up spiritual where we can hear the Spirit of truth with in and not man and his systems without. We should not ignore the revelation of the Bible just because most theologians in the past or present could not search it out or get pass their bias. Today there is a god out there that men worship call religion, church, orthodoxy and tradition that has taken the place of seeking truth. Just like the Jews; christians find themselves controlled by their religious past with all of its rituals, dogmas and traditions and they are totally blind too the reality of the Bible. We put out trust in one of the 22,000 denominations; without instead of the Holy Spirit of truth within. This is why we miss God; because we would rather hear men.

We say we look at truth as Christians; but in reality we are looking at it so often though someone else’s understanding and ignoring what the Bible truly has to say.

God is not a brain; He is a spirit. His Word is literal if all you desire is milk; but the deepness of God is far more then the letter that killeth.


You know I am not buying this, what you are engaed in here in this post is alagorizing not typeology. You are importing meaning into the Biblical ext, not drawing it out. That first miricle had nothing to do with what you suggest, but thank you for your ideas, yet I really cannot agree. :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.