TLK Valentine
I've already read the books you want burned.
- Apr 15, 2012
- 64,493
- 30,322
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It appears to have only been seen by these men, as Herod had to inquire when it appeared.
but you say literal translation only. literal translation star is star, nothing else.It's either a type of star that God created that scientists are unfamiliar with; or it's an object that can be semantically referred to as a star; e.g., "falling star" for meteor.
Then why do scientists scratch themselves silly trying to figure it out?Then the word you're looking for is 'hallucination."
Anyone even remotely familiar with the book of Revelation knows better than to take the book of Revelation with absolute literalism.but you say literal translation only. literal translation star is star, nothing else.
Anyone even remotely familiar with the book of Revelation knows better than to take the book of Revelation with absolute literalism.
Revelation 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
That bolded part means the book was "signified" or "encoded" into symbolic language.
It's still literal, but encoded into symbolic language.
Under no circumstances whatsoever is the literal translation of the King James Bible to be contradicted.
No.so Revelations violates rule 1?
Then why do scientists scratch themselves silly trying to figure it out?
Running it through their big Y2K computers and trying to associate it with mundane records of who was governor and employing their big-shot scientific methods and coming up with ....
... nothing?
Now you come along and say it was an hallucination?
LOL
Mabye the god (muse) of science should have checked with you first?
Not this Christian.They don't --Christians scratch themsleves silly trying to pass it off as science.
It wouldn't be a star as we know it.
Remember the star of Bethlehem?
I believe it was a hologram.
They are animals now extinct.Unicorns as featured in the KJV aren't literally unicorns, either, are they AV?
No, you don't.I believe it was a 7-headed dragon playing stupid pranks.
Just the other day you were claiming the Bible is talking about some sort of gazelle or something. Which, as I say, isn't LITERALLY a unicorn, is it?They are animals now extinct.
Huh?Just the other day you were claiming the Bible is talking about some sort of gazelle or something.
The Bible doesn't mention it as a "problem" either.
I did not speculate in order to solve the problem; I speculated in order to solve your problem.
I don't know ... would they?
Nothing at first.
At maximum capacity, it had the Ten Commandments, Aaron's rod that budded, and I believe a pot of manna; if my memory serves me correctly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?