- Apr 11, 2005
- 73,951
- 10,060
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Private
Essentially it is a federal [who is federal?] mandate aka 'demand' that schools allow boys to compete in girls sports and locker rooms et al - or - lose free or assisted funding for lunches for poor children.
There ya go. Blackmail the children, hold them hostage to your demands or they go hungry.
So they got upset at Tulsi...
See:
time.com
Yet advocates argue the introduction of “Protect Women’s Sports Act” goes directly against those commitments.
A number of state legislatures have tried to pass legislation over the past year aimed at prohibiting trans women and girls from participating in female sports teams. Idaho Gov. Brad Little signed the “Fairness in Women’s Sports Act” into law in March, which said no female sports teams could be open to “students of the male sex” and a “dispute” could be resolved by presenting a signed physician’s statement on the student’s sex based on their “internal and external reproductive anatomy.” A federal judge struck down the law in March, writing that the state had not provided a “legitimate interest” the Act served “other than an invalid interest of excluding transgender women and girls from women’s sports entirely, regardless of their physiological characteristics.”
There ya go. Blackmail the children, hold them hostage to your demands or they go hungry.
So they got upset at Tulsi...
See:
Tulsi Gabbard Introduces Bill That Would Ban Trans Women and Girls from Female Sports
Gabbard's bill was immediately decried by LGBTQ+ advocates
Yet advocates argue the introduction of “Protect Women’s Sports Act” goes directly against those commitments.
A number of state legislatures have tried to pass legislation over the past year aimed at prohibiting trans women and girls from participating in female sports teams. Idaho Gov. Brad Little signed the “Fairness in Women’s Sports Act” into law in March, which said no female sports teams could be open to “students of the male sex” and a “dispute” could be resolved by presenting a signed physician’s statement on the student’s sex based on their “internal and external reproductive anatomy.” A federal judge struck down the law in March, writing that the state had not provided a “legitimate interest” the Act served “other than an invalid interest of excluding transgender women and girls from women’s sports entirely, regardless of their physiological characteristics.”
Last edited:
