Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Truth and Knowledge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SelfSim" data-source="post: 74731170" data-attributes="member: 354922"><p>.. and the thing to notice about every 'thing' you just hypothesized about there, is the mind dependence of any 'truth' value in any of them .. (Hallucinations however, may produce inconsistencies, but they still require a mind .. and that mind may well replace what we regard as 'reality' with those hallucinations).</p><p>Any truth in what you said, comes from <em>the meanings</em> of those words .. and never <em>'the something'</em> being referred to (like a duck, a quack, eggs, etc).</p><p></p><p>Outright rejection of the meaning of 'truth', or 'belief', is the same as rejecting the meanings of all those words. There is work to be done in understanding what 'truth' and 'belief' and 'real' means in conversations .. avoidance of that just limits understanding.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SelfSim, post: 74731170, member: 354922"] .. and the thing to notice about every 'thing' you just hypothesized about there, is the mind dependence of any 'truth' value in any of them .. (Hallucinations however, may produce inconsistencies, but they still require a mind .. and that mind may well replace what we regard as 'reality' with those hallucinations). Any truth in what you said, comes from [I]the meanings[/I] of those words .. and never [I]'the something'[/I] being referred to (like a duck, a quack, eggs, etc). Outright rejection of the meaning of 'truth', or 'belief', is the same as rejecting the meanings of all those words. There is work to be done in understanding what 'truth' and 'belief' and 'real' means in conversations .. avoidance of that just limits understanding. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Truth and Knowledge
Top
Bottom