Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Trump Just Dismissed the People in Charge of Maintaining Our Nuclear Arsenal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeventyOne" data-source="post: 70669740" data-attributes="member: 376402"><p>A. It may or may not be true.</p><p></p><p>B. Who cares?</p><p></p><p>C. Even the article stated the biggest effect is that if they aren't replaced within a few months (huge assumption), the agency won't have an advocate when it comes time to secure a budget from Congress.</p><p></p><p>D. Because of C, see B.</p><p></p><p></p><p>From the story, "To some extent, what we’re talking about is the political leadership, the leadership appointed by each administration,” Rosner told Gizmodo."</p><p></p><p>So, the story is that Trump is replacing the head of an agency, under his Executive control, where the immediate effect would be there might not be an advocate for the agency's budget several months down the road. But that is only assuming he has no successors in mind, and just did it to do it. If he has successors in mind, and just hasn't announced them, then it's a non-story as they would then take on the role as budget advocates.</p><p></p><p>And this makes people freak out why?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeventyOne, post: 70669740, member: 376402"] A. It may or may not be true. B. Who cares? C. Even the article stated the biggest effect is that if they aren't replaced within a few months (huge assumption), the agency won't have an advocate when it comes time to secure a budget from Congress. D. Because of C, see B. From the story, "To some extent, what we’re talking about is the political leadership, the leadership appointed by each administration,” Rosner told Gizmodo." So, the story is that Trump is replacing the head of an agency, under his Executive control, where the immediate effect would be there might not be an advocate for the agency's budget several months down the road. But that is only assuming he has no successors in mind, and just did it to do it. If he has successors in mind, and just hasn't announced them, then it's a non-story as they would then take on the role as budget advocates. And this makes people freak out why? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Trump Just Dismissed the People in Charge of Maintaining Our Nuclear Arsenal
Top
Bottom