Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Trump Illegally appointed Ken Cuccinelli as head of Immigration - Ken's policy memos are null&void
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Josheb" data-source="post: 74783256" data-attributes="member: 345061"><p>Yep. Yep. Once again, this was already explained to you. </p><p></p><p>I understand in the short run it might be easier for me to either point you to the original post containing the answer to the questions asked or repeat myself, but I have no reason and no evidence to believe you wouldn't repeat the problem again and again and again and the <u><em>evidence</em></u> already shows you're not actually reading (or possibly comprehending) what was posted so the more judicious response is to point out the problem and leave you to be responsible for yourself believing, trusting, hoping you'll demonstrate something warranting further discourse.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But that's not what you do. </p><p></p><p>I get it. </p><p></p><p>Posting about whether or not I should repeat myself is just one more digression evidencing the problem to be solved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Josheb, post: 74783256, member: 345061"] Yep. Yep. Once again, this was already explained to you. I understand in the short run it might be easier for me to either point you to the original post containing the answer to the questions asked or repeat myself, but I have no reason and no evidence to believe you wouldn't repeat the problem again and again and again and the [U][I]evidence[/I][/U] already shows you're not actually reading (or possibly comprehending) what was posted so the more judicious response is to point out the problem and leave you to be responsible for yourself believing, trusting, hoping you'll demonstrate something warranting further discourse. But that's not what you do. I get it. Posting about whether or not I should repeat myself is just one more digression evidencing the problem to be solved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Trump Illegally appointed Ken Cuccinelli as head of Immigration - Ken's policy memos are null&void
Top
Bottom