M
Sorry, mistook you for some else I think. Someone out here said that if they claimed they were an atheist they had to justify their claims. Basic epistemology!
Further the agnostic (weak one) makes no knowledge claims and doesn't have that burden.
The person I was replying to seems to understand that basic distinction (rare out here), but you clearly conflate those two as the same claim.
I take back the "bravo", as you neither prepared to defend "haven't read any books in support of atheism," or recognize the difference between someone claiming, "Not P," and someone claiming, "I have no knowledge that P is true or not true."
Sorry for the confusion.